Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

Alameda's Smoking Rules Revisited: City Council to Vote on Revised Ordinance

The City's secondhand smoke ordinance — with several changes — will get its final hearing on Nov. 15

 

Alameda City Council members are scheduled for a final vote Nov. 15 on a revised version of tough new smoking regulations for the city's workplaces, multi-unit housing and public spaces.

The meeting will include both a public hearing on the issue and the second (final) reading of the ordinance.

The proposed ordinance incorporates several changes that the council requested during its Nov. 1 meeting. They include:

• Removing language specifically pertaining to off-street outdoor patios at bars and taverns, thereby maintaining the status quo under state law.

In practice, this change would allow smoking to continue in the back patios of taverns such as The Churchward Pub and Lucky 13 on Park Street.

• Prohibiting smoking in all units of common-interest complexes (such as condominiums), including balconies and porches. The original version of the proposed ordinance banned smoking in new units but not existing ones.

"The council heard loud and clear from the public who spoke up or submitted comments that they wanted condos included,” Assistant City Manager Lisa Goldman said after the Nov. 1 meeting.

She noted that condominiums can set up community smoking areas if those areas meet the standards outlined in the ordinance.

• Adding a nuisance provision to the housing section of the ordinance.

According to a staff report, "A nuisance declaration makes it easier for an individual to seek the redress of grievances through the civil court system, because a nuisance declaration lessens the burden of proof for an individual seeking private civil action."

"In the housing context, declaring secondhand smoke a nuisance is helpful because it eliminates the need to prove that some particular level of exposure has occurred and then to prove that such exposure is an unjustified intrusion or hazard."

• Deleting electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) from the definition of smoking.

The provisions related to workplace smoking and smoking in outdoor public places would become effective 30 days after adoption of the ordinance (Dec. 15, 2011, if the council approves the ordinance at its Nov. 15 meeting).

Those related to smoking in rental complexes and common interest complexes would be phased in more gradually, with an implementation date of Jan. 1, 2013, according to the staff report.

The council also asked city staff to research whether smoking could be banned on public beaches in Alameda. If that is found to be feasible, it could be added as an amendment to the ordinance in the future.

Enforcement of the ordinance would be "complaint driven," Goldman said.

"The police are going to enforce it, but this will not their top priority," she said. "If they receive a call they will respond … their goal is to mediate and explain what the laws are.”

The City of Alameda website now has a new Secondhand Smoke Ordinance page that includes a summary of the ordinance and links to the proposed ordinance, staff reports and other items.

It also links to the City Zoning Map. The proposed ordinance bans smoking on commercial-area sidewalks, which are defined as public sidewalks in downtown shopping and business areas designated with a “C” prefix on the map.

Public comments on the proposed ordinance may be sent to Terri Wright at twright@ci.alameda.ca.us.

Related Topics: Alameda City Council and Smoking Ordinance

Jaan Carter

9:17 am on Monday, November 7, 2011

I was so happy to read this article, until I see that the "gradual" implementation of this ordinance for apartment dwellers like me would have to wait more than a YEAR to get some change. WHY is this? Because smokers need a year's warning?? I don't understand this. I don't want another year of other people's cigarette smoke filling my home. I am most disappointed.

Reply

Serena Chen

5:30 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

@ Jaan: The Bay Area Smokefree Housing Project of the American Lung Association has been helping landlords and property managers adopt smoke-free policies. Please visit our website: www.casmokefreehousing.org for materials on how to do this. Contact us if you need help.

Reply

Stickarmz

9:01 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011

@ Jaan: This is a former Navy town in transition and, even though I've never been a smoker, I think it's a very fair transition. Are you a recent transplant? What if this ordinance had never been considered? Would you continue to live here?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marla bodi

3:40 pm on Wednesday, November 16, 2011

I am not, in general, an addictive person, but I rued the day I began smoking. whew! It's a serious addiction and a very very difficult one, for many people --perhaps the majority-- to stop. I tried many times in absolutely "no brainer" circumstances to no avail; and I finally had to constantly notice how my hair, my hands, my clothes, my closet, my house --everything!-- smelled of smoke and how much that just plain stunk! I finally followed the advice of a friend to suggested I empty all cigarette butts into a "industrial-size" jar until it was at least half full and keep it to open and sniff whenever I thought I HAD to have a cigarette. belch-h-h. It worked! My partner. otoh, decided he'd stop and just DID. It's different for everyone, but one year seems fair because first you have to get your head around the idea. If the American Lung Assoc. has options as well, I'd try them, too. Thankfully, I've been smoke-free for almost <omigod!> 30 years, and I am HAPPY about it. Good luck to all! You know in your heart that the sooner you quit, the better ...for everyone, especially YOU. ;o)

Marla bodi

3:45 pm on Wednesday, November 16, 2011

ADDENDUM: Re: e-cigarettes ...egads, those contain propylene glycol! The same stuff that's in anti-freeze, many deodorants, etc. No matter what some (usually the manufacturers or the distributors!) claim, that stuff is poison. I hope e-cigarettes are banned as well, for that reason alone. Smoking is not healthy and e-cigarettes are REALLY not healthy. Seems to me we should be helping each other develop healthier habits, which also cuts down health care costs all around?

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how