- Local every day in
Updated: Man Dies in Alameda After Walking into Bay
A 52-year-old man walked fully clothed into the San Francisco Bay Monday morning from Alameda's Crown Beach. He died after spending nearly an hour in water.
A good Samaritan swimmer pulled a 52-year-old Alameda man 50 yards back to Alameda's Crown Beach Monday afternoon after the man walked fully clothed into San Francisco Bay, according to Lt. Joe McNiff of the Alameda Police Department.
Emergency personnel waiting on the beach found the man unresponsive after a reported 60 minutes in the water and took him to Alameda Hospital.
He was taken to the Alameda County Coroner's Office where he was identified as Raymond Zack, according to Deputy D. Sanchez.
"He's scheduled for an autopsy tomorrow," said Sgt. M. Denobriga also of the coroner's office. "The doctors will determine the cause of death."
The Alameda Police Department called the Coast Guard at 11:34 a.m. with reports that a man had walked into the surf near the intersection of Shoreline Drive and Willow Street.
Neither the Alameda Police Department nor the Alameda Fire Department is certified in land-based water rescue, according to a police statement released Monday evening.
"The Alameda Fire Department does not currently have, and is not certified, in land-based water rescues," read the statement. "The City of Alameda primarily relies on the United States Coast Guard for these types of events."
The good Samaritan, who was not identified by authorities but was described as a woman in her 20s, dove into the water to rescue the man, according to Petty Officer Erik Swanson of the United States Coast Guard.
The man was pulled from the water at 12:29 p.m., according to McNiff.
The Coast Guard responded to the attempted rescue with a boat and a Dolphin helicopter.
Swanson said that the good Samaritan was doing fine after the rescue effort.
Alamedian
2:54 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
It was a shame the man drowned. Saw the whole thing unfold from our balcony on Shoreline. I ended calling the police after seeing the man face down in the water. At one point a wind surfer who lives in these apartments approached the man out in the water when he was still standing and surfed away so I assumed he was ok. But not 20 minutes later the man walked further out in the bay and eventually went face down in the water. It was over 20 minutes before the good samaritan pulled him out, not sure why the police who were already at the scene didn't go in the water themselves. Very sad day. Keep us posted if you get more information.
Thanks
simmons
6:41 am on Monday, June 6, 2011
What is even more ironic and sad?
If these worthless Police and Firemen cowards had never been called, or if they had just taking their sorry butts down the road to the nearest donut shop, the man would have been rescued by uncertified citizens in less than 10 minutes, without training, or a boat, or a chopper and without jurisdiction.
Rocketmandb
3:15 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
We were playing volleyball and watched the whole thong unfold. We saw the man wade out and watched him until the police arrived. He was standing in waste to chest deep water for more than an hour and we thought the 20+ police, fire/rescue and paramedics had it under control. It wasn't until we lost sight of him standing only to be followed by the realization that what we thought was debris was actually his body that we realized that collectively we had let this man die. He was never more than a couple hundred yards from shore. Had any of us known that he had gone head down, we easily could have made the swim to him. We thought the officials were looking out fir him. Clearly they were not. They watched him through binoculars for more than 45 minutes until he finally put his head down.
Disgusted
4:25 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
The title of this article should read: Alameda Police and Fire watch on shore and do nothing as man drowns.
simmons
6:17 am on Monday, June 6, 2011
"A good Samaritan swimmer pulled a 52-year-old Alameda man 50 yards back to Alameda's Crown Beach"
A 20 year old woman pulled him out. I wonder where she received her training? I suspect church or her parents or other decent people trained her.
If I lived in Alameda I sould spit on every policeman or fireman I saw every chance I had.
Georgia M. Petrie
6:49 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
I think it is absolutely unacceptable that something like this should be allowed to happen. Whether or not they are trained or if it's a jurisdictional issue, who cares. As humans, someone should have gotten out there and brought the guy in. Now, on another note, a friend who lives at the apartments across the street, did say that he saw the man and noticed that there was clearly a mental issue with the man. He said that there was definitely something not right about him.
alameda4life
7:56 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
The former Mayor and city manager are to blame. They cut the resources that would have given this guy a chance at being rescued.
joel
11:38 pm on Saturday, June 4, 2011
Are we in the USA the land of the braves or the land of the sheep , tghey were all so disciplined that not a single one got their feet wet , by the way the funds were not cut for water vrescue , you mean that in order to walk on a sandbar you need a different pay raste? Cowards that's all they are.
I wonder if they keep watching their video again.
simmons
6:25 am on Monday, June 6, 2011
I wonder if anyone was ever saved from drowning before they had these training schools? If so, how did these heros of the past become heros without the proper training?
The politicians share some blame but NO ONE makes another human become the worthless piece of crap it takes to standby and watch, for over an hour, while another human die, and not lift a finger to help.
One has to be born that worthless and heartless.
alameda4life
8:11 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
Its a shame that these politicians put our rescuers in handcuffs and dont allow them to do the job that they want to do. Do you think they wanted to stand there and watch the guy drown? These politicians are so disconnected with the public and dont seem to care much about the services that we pay for. Glad we have a new Mayor and City Manager. Hopefully they will do the right thing.
joel
11:39 pm on Saturday, June 4, 2011
Excuse me who elected the past and present Mayor , the frierighter and police union . open your eyes
Kate Quick
9:08 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
In the news tonight it was made to be that our firefighters and police personnel "elected" to let this man die because they did not have jurisdiction over his rescue - the Coast Guard did. We need to know what the whole story is, because that just does not seem right, nor is it in keeping with our public safety personnel that I know. Can someone get to the bottom of this, please?
a94501er
1:14 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Kate is always Quick to defend APD/AFD. Fact is they failed to rescue the man, because they lacked "certification". Let us remember their incompetence when they come around asking for money, as they always do.
joel
10:48 pm on Sunday, June 5, 2011
Kate
Last year you defended lena tam for passsing internal memo to Suncal , now you are defending those cowards , they did never asked the high speed rescue from san leandro {they have 2} they have no record of calls from the AFD , AFD called the coast guard which had to come from San Francisco crossing the entire bay , the Helicopter was in another dispatch and had to refuel , meanwhile they all watch the man threading waster until hypothermia took him and drowned , anyone , anyone could have walk to help him out , after 30 minutes he was allready out , a little lady pull him, out and hand him over to the big COWARD alameda firefighters , in most country it is called homicide by negligence. Oh but they are your Unions buddies sdo thast make ir all right .
Eve Pearlman
9:24 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
Hi Kate. The Alameda Police Department released a statement a bit ago: "Police and Fire commanders on scene called the United States Coast Guard for assistance. The Coast Guard dispatched a 25-foot propeller driven rescue vessel from Station San Francisco and a helicopter from Air Station San Francisco. The Coast Guard vessel was on scene in 20 minutes, but due to the shallow nature of the Bay at the individual’s location they were unable to get close enough to him to attempt a rescue. The helicopter arrived 65 minutes after notification. The helicopter had been on another mission and had to return to the airfield to refuel. The helicopter then had to request permission to enter the Oakland International Airport’s airspace before arriving on scene. Prior to the Coast Guard’s arrival to the individual’s location he lost consciousness and began to drift towards shore."
And more from the statement: "Other agencies contacted for assistance with the water rescue included the Alameda County Fire Department, Oakland Fire Department, Alameda County Sheriff’s Department, the Oakland Police Department, and the East Bay Regional Park Police District. These agencies were unable to provide any additional rescue capabilities. The Alameda Fire Department does not currently have, and is not certified, in land-based water rescues. The City of Alameda primarily relies on the United States Coast Guard for these types of events."
joel
11:50 pm on Saturday, June 4, 2011
They called the pentagon which relayed the information to the homeland security which then contacted the coast guard the cutter is at sea the other draw too much water , so they rerouted an helicopter which requested the permission to enter Oakland air space {anyone need that permission}they then contacted the city manager the mayor out for lunch who contacted the city attorney who contacted the interim police chief who contacted the interim fire chief in the mean time a little woman pulled the guy out of the watter and now face charge for stealing the job a bunch of COWARDS could not do in 10 minutes. simple as that .
Eve Pearlman
9:31 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
I also just spoke to APD's Lieutenant Joseph McNiff who had this comment: "This was a tragic incident that we wished we could have resolved in a different way, but we weren’t able to ... The Fire Department is not certified in land-based water rescue and the Police Department has never had a land-based water rescue certification and the Coast Guard wasn’t able to get him.”
He also said: “We reached out to all the other resources that we have available to us but again no one was able to get to him … Obviously there’s going to be a thorough review of today’s incident and we will certainly look at all our options in the future.”
a94501er
1:52 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
What does it take for 6 able bodied cops/firefighters to wade into the water and pull the man out? It appears he was standing there for an hour (!!!!!!!!!!!) and barely 50 yards away.
Were APD/AFD afraid of getting their uniforms wet?
joel
9:38 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Ms Pearlman , please on the name of human decency , no certification are required to assist anyone in danger , none what so ever , just common sense , you and I can walk there , they could not?
I know that I have with my daughter in the past . that is gross negligence .
AlamedaNative
9:47 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
Not certified in land based rescue??? You've got to be kidding! I'm not "certified" but can easily swim/walk out in the bay off Alameda and have done so since childhood. You don't need to be "certified". You need a freaking heart!!!! Alameda is surrounded by water and our local police/fire depts. won't rescue someone in the water??? People's heads need to roll. This is totally unacceptable, disgusting and frightening.
Frances Montell
10:55 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Have you ever actually attempted a water rescue? Many people have drowned trying to rescue someone else. There is a reason that lifeguards need to be trained. Swimming 50 yards with such a large person is not as easy as it looks. (And it doesn't look that easy.) And this was not a small child who wanted to be rescued but an almost 300 lb adult male who most probably did not want to be rescued, and probably would not have cooperated with the rescuer. (After all, why did he walk into the water fully clothed in the first place?) It is tragic that he died, but it is not clear exactly what should have happened. (Who should have gone in the water? How should they have "rescued" him?) I for one don't feel I have all the answers.
Jack Boeger
11:08 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Frances, I think you are missing the point (and many others are too.)
As I've been saying (I'm a former lifeguard), this would have been an ill-advised rescue for the untrained.
The point is... the policy has been in place for 2 years that "under no circumstances" are first responders to go into the water... and unless you read every letter to the editor in the Alameda Sun, none of us knew. What else are they not allowed to do?
Frances Montell
11:26 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
I was responding to the idea that anyone could just "easily swim/walk" out into chest high water and rescue a large adult male who most probably did not want to be rescued. (After all, if he had wanted to get back to shore, why did he not simply walk himself back?) This was not a clear-cut case in any way: it was between jurisdictions, too far out for a safe land-based rescue by someone who wasn't trained, too shallow for the Coast Guard boat, not clear what"rescue" would actually entail as the man was not physically drowning and didn't appear to need physical help getting to safety. I think the point is the people who think this was a simple case and that they know exactly what should have been done are wrong.
joel
11:00 pm on Sunday, June 5, 2011
Frances Montell ,
when the fire fighters and the police officers enrolled the very first page said
" to protect and serve " and yes anyone could have walk on the sand bar anyone tha leave in Alameda has , maybe you should try , after 30 minutes in the water he was deeply hypothermic and no danger to anyone not even Himself , this is based on the cold water rescue data check them out , then do speak . I JUST DID . this is further highlighted by the fact a "petite " woman pulled him out and 300 lbs as you claim of dead weight is no small task , I have done it years ago , your argument to defend the coward firemen are very sad , it is time they come down to reality , but it migh mean they will have to soil the uniform we provide and clean for them .
smcmom
10:40 pm on Monday, May 30, 2011
How sad. Working on an island with a good size beach and being "not certified" makes no sense for police and especially fire/rescue departments. I recall images of heroic officers and firefighters risking their lives to rescue flood victims from raging swollen rivers; victims who have fallen through frozen ice; car accident victims who have gone into the water from bridges...and no Alameda city police or fire professional could wade out from a beach and TRY to help the victim?
Rocketmandb
6:40 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
"The Coast Guard dispatched a 25-foot propeller driven rescue vessel from Station San Francisco and a helicopter from Air Station San Francisco. The Coast Guard vessel was on scene in 20 minutes, but due to the shallow nature of the Bay at the individual’s location they were unable to get close enough to him to attempt a rescue."
As I mentioned above, I was there the whole time and never saw a Coast Guard vessel, not to mention that a 25 foot vessel should have been able to get into the 4' water this guy was standing in. All any of us on the shore needed to know was that the rescue workers weren't able or willing to help and we could have waded - yes waded - out to him. He was never more than a couple hundred yards away. We were lulled into a false sense of security because the rescue workers were on the scene.
frank
7:20 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
This was not a 'tragic inncident' this was ridicolous. What if it had been a child drowning? At some point it becomes a human being saving another human being.
Lightingirl
7:45 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
I can't help but think what if this was a child? It seems unbelievable that our fire dept or police dept are
"not certified for water rescue" when WE LIVE ON AN ISLAND!!!! How can this be???? I say, GET CERTIFIED!!!!!
Even still, they should have let regular citizens around them know that they did not have this jurisdiction so that someone else could step up. There are kite surfers all over the place. Regular citizens have the right to go out and try to help rescue someone... If they were worried about a lawsuit... I imagine they will get one now, sad to say... How incredibly lame... and did I say sad?...
rocketman
7:57 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Update to the story: APD or AFD don't have the proper cleaning equipment should their uniform get wet from the salt water, thus they were not able to assist in the rescue.
melissa sherak
8:35 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
These are our saviors? In the past few years we have watched these Super Heroes that get great salaries along with pensions that us tax payers pay for. In these past few years we have watched this Police Dept. make mistake after mistake.... For example - Killing 2 police dogs (one was pure neglect by leaving the dog in the car), WE AS CITIZENS WOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED IF IT WERE US! They won't even let us know which officer let him die. They have only solved the obvious murders here in town. We have officers who solicited themselves as prescription drug collectors , Oh by the way- What ever happened in that case? This is just another screw up which we will get every excuse in the world, Typical . About this Gentlemen at the beach...Has anyone read the memo that we do live on an Island and there has been and will be other rescues involving water? This has got to be one of the worst forces that I have seen. Extremely embarrassing to Alameda. Our condolences to the Mans family. This should have never happened. The truth of the matter is they need to go back to training to learn.
Jenna
8:44 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
I'm glad the man is no longer suffering from the mental anguish that drove him to take this final action. He's out of pain now.
Karen Zeltzer
9:18 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Jenna, no one needs to remain in a state of mental anguish long enough to see suicide as the only escape. There is a tremendous and profound difference between ending pain and ending life. There are many services in Alameda and in Alameda County to help people decrease/ alleviate depression and other difficult emotional states that could have made a differenece for this man. It is dangerous to support the idea that it is good that he is out of his anguish. He is also out of his life and this is the tragedy. Crisis support servcices has a 24 hour hotiline, Alameda Family Services has low cost counseling, Emergency rooms one can walk into for immediate help, Sausal Creek in Oakland is a walk in crisis center...the list goes on. Help is available to improve the quality of one's life so that suicide is not necessary as the only out.
TAMHD
11:10 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
I agree with you, Jenna. Local rescue services did not act, which is a serious problem. However, this man wanted to die. Someone should have been able to help him before it got to the point of attempting suicide, but that didn't happen or perhaps any attempts to help him were not effective enough. He was obviously experiencing extreme anguish, and at least he's not anymore.
joel
10:35 pm on Sunday, June 5, 2011
Jenna did you read your post?
"You are glad he is no longer suffering his mental anguish "
It took Him 1 hour to die in front of a crowd of some 70 firefighters , Police Officers taking picture with their cell phone.
This is the reflextion on how low our society has sunken to make such statement .
Michael
8:51 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
The vast majority of our city budget goes to pay for police and fire. It is completely unacceptable that our highly paid police and fire officials can only stand by and watch while a man drowns in a few feet of water. This is not only a black eye for our public safety departments, but for the entire community.
Nancy Johnsen Horton
9:02 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
This is a perfect scenario for Alameda's fire boat rescue unit. Trained to rescue on the water, and right at home in the Estuary. Oh, wait. It was decommissioned due to budget cuts.
RWCinthebox
9:25 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
En jay aitch, I understand your concern about losing things like the fire boat rescue unit to budget cuts, but it sounds obvious that a boat is not what would've helped here. If this happened in waist to neck high water 150 feet offshore than a couple of rescuers (cops, firefighters, EMTs, SOMEONE) would've sufficed. Unfortunately it was probably this kind of jump to use excessive resources that got the unit cut. (and the high pay, benefits & pensions of police that never get cut. I'm usually more reluctant to bring up firefighters since they have more use & put themselves in danger far more than your average cops.) though if there was this kind of unit, where are all the trained officers?
Cecile Costa
10:24 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
I can't add much to the previous comments, except to say I am stunned by the news. I, too, am a native Alamedan and have always enjoyed our "island lifestyle." Key words: Island. Water-based recreation. Boating. Beaches. Shallow water. I know we don't maintain a lifeguard service, so you play and swim at your own risk. However, a reasonable person would expect a response, even if delayed, from local first responders who would know what to do. And, since it can be very hazardous when good Samaritans risk a water rescue, onlookers who are not strong and experienced swimmers should not go in. I don't understand why these first responders didn't make use of the available flotation devices and the strong swimmers wind surfing nearby. Surely some of these folks would have been glad to assist the professionals in any way they could. I will be following this story carefully -- this is a dreadful event that should have had a different ending. And, it's beyond shocking that a citizen had to retrieve this poor man's body. Unbelievable.
Another 94501er
11:01 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
To have a safety force for a community surrounded by water that is not even trained in basic water safety is horrifying. This is a death that should have been prevented, instead of watched for 90 minutes. These are the same police and firefighters that consume more than two thirds of our city's budget and demand to be paid nearly 90% of their salary annually after they retire in their 50s and continue to not serve our community.
After a showing like this and the FISC fire in 2009, among other regular embarrassments, it's time to let Marie Gilmore and City Council know that Alamedans deserve better for our tax dollars.
alameda4life
11:52 am on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Tell the city manager. they are the ones that cut the program. remember her? she apparently didnt care that we live on an island and she cut the water rescue program. maybe you should actually find out whats going on in our city and who is to blame.
Another 94501er
9:46 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
You're right, Debra Kurita was terrible for this city, and this is another example of her horrific legacy of mismanagement.
alameda vigilante
12:42 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
This is a horrible scandal calling for investigative journalism like DATELINE or 20/20! Public safety employees must stop worrying about whether they have "permission", or "jurisdiction", or are "certified". If you know how to swim & are strong enough to pull someone's head above the water, JUST DO IT!!! You certainly get paid enough! I'd also like to believe you have a moral compass that doesn't depend on what the mayor or city manager might think! I hope this isn't related to the fact that most public safety employees live inland, not on an island like Alameda; which may result in their feeling morally disconnected from our community!
alameda4life
1:29 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
I doubt the public safety employees "worry" about what the mayor or city manager "think". its not a popularity contest. the politicians run this town and we should blame them for not making a us have a water rescue team. after all, it was the politicians that said they didnt want it. Do they live on the island?
Karen Zeltzer
1:45 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
I agree totally with alameda4life. Do not blame the men and women on scene for not "choosing" to save this man. What a horrible position they were put in. Most of us will never be in that kind of a position once that they are put in daily. They have to follow policy and procedures. Look to the root of the problem which we are, at this point, only making guesses. There will be a thorough investigation and the root of the problem will be addressed and it would be nice to stop making negative comment and judgments from our comfortable couches and desks as to what should have happened or not happend at the scene. We should come together as a community and support our safety officers and work on policies and procedures to support their ability to handle siatutions in the most productive ways possible.
a94501er
9:25 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Please riddle me this: would they have continued to sit on the sidelines if it was one of their co-workers? I think not ... therein lies the rub.
Ken Pritten
5:58 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
It is sad to hear this story, and I'm sad to read about people thinking those professionals were prevented from doing the right thing because of policy. We all choose what we can and cannot do in any given instance. Many reasonable people would consider that "Policy" a guideline.
Take for instance a law like don't cross over the double yellow line while driving down a road. If that man had ran into the lane in front of an oncoming truck, should the driver disregard policy if there is no oncoming trafic and move across the line? Or, should the driver run over the man and say "There was nothing I could do. It was only a two lane road and my department policy states that I cannot cross the double yellow line."
I wonder how many of the fire and police department personel present asked to be relieved from duty so they could bring the man in on their own time without breaking department policy?
Frances Montell
11:03 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
That is an interesting analogy. The question also might be: should the driver go over the yellow line to avoid hitting the man who purposely placed himself in danger and risk hitting an oncoming car in its own lane? There are a lot of people commenting who seem to have all the answers, but I am not 100% sure how to get a full grown almost 300 lb man who has waded into the water back to shore and I doubt everyone commenting here knows either. Again, we are not talking about a small child who accidentally got in trouble, but a full grown man who went out there on purpose and might not have cooperated with those trying to "help" him.
Kate Quick
1:46 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Kate did not defend anybody. Kate said that she wanted to know the truth of the matter, because it sounded so unlike the APD and AFD people she knew. Kate also does not think that it is fair to excoriate all these folks as if every member of our police and fire services conspired to cause someone's death. That's pretty over the top, and unhelpful. Personally, I have found both of these public safety services to be professional and helpful and like the fact that they are there to risk their lives to protect me and my property. The INDIVIDUALS who were there and did not take action, for whatever reason, are those who we should be concentrating finding out the truth from, not tarring and feathering everyone.
a94501er
2:24 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
What is this? George is getting upset a la Seinfeld?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEyaxm26YBI
What if the situation was reversed and we had an APD/AFD crew member in the water for an hour? I am sure both depts would've pulled out all the stops to rescue their colleague, certification rules notwithstanding.
Dawna
2:03 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Such a tragic event that happened. We live on an island...we should have firefighters, police and first responders that can make a water RESCUE!!! I am even more mad at myself for not knowing that we would not be rescued in the event of a water accident.....and we are surrounded by water....just seems like it can't be true.
Alameda Mom
2:29 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Blaming Doesn’t End the Horror of Suicide
I am appalled at the lack of support that Alameda is giving our police and fire departments following such a tragic event. If this same man held a gun to kill himself, we would not expect police to wrestle the gun away. Why not? Because we understand that such a tussle would increase the chance that he would pull the trigger either against himself or one of his rescuers. Nor would we expect police and fire to wrestle the same man off the edge of a building. Why not? Because he would be more likely to jump and possibly take others with him. This tragic suicide is no different. This man was approx. 200 yds off shore in chest deep water, cold enough to cause hypothermia. He did not want to leave the water. A windsurfer got close enough to the man to speak with him, which only made the man move out deeper. If police and fire stripped down and swam to him, he may have moved even deeper, killing himself sooner; would our community blame police and fire for being too impulsive? And what if they did get close enough to talk with him?
(Continued in next comment)
Alameda Mom
2:31 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
For how long would we expect police and fire to stand there –twenty, thirty minutes- trying to talk him "off the ledge", out of the water? By then we would possible be grieving the death of multiple people; hypothermia is very real. And what if those same police and fire attempted to wrestle him onto shore from 200 yards out in chest deep water? He may have pulled several of them underwater with him just as a person killing themselves with a gun or jumping may take others who physically interfere. This was both a very tragic and dangerous situation. I am certain that the police and fire personnel at the scene are grieving that they could not save this man. I am also certain that Alamedans can raise above their own grief and horror of this man ending his own life without blaming our police and fire personnel.
a94501er
4:06 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Alameda Mom, your comments are ludicrous. Nobody is suggesting the police/fire spend an eternity talking to him while they are all standing in the water ... all it needs is a few (ok, 6 if they are paranoid) able bodied personnel to drag him out of the water.
You can't be possibly that naive can you?
Clearly, the presence of a large police/fire contigent on the beach prevented others from rescuing him. Witness the comments by Rocketmandb (above) where he was lulled into a false sense of security. Not only did police/fire fail to act ... their very presence also deterred others from any rescue efforts.
Under the circumstances, the nurse who attempted to rescue the man is a hero ... while the "so called" professionals were content to sit back and watch. Disgusting.
a94501er
4:07 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
that should read "contingent"
Alameda Mom
5:32 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Unfortunately, for the man who died, my comments are not ludicrous. This was not a simple water rescue situation. It was a suicide call. As other news sources are now reporting, the man was quite large (over 6 feet tall and close to 300 pounds). He did not want to come out of the water; thus, there was a very good chance that he would not have come out without a good fight – that is a fight in five foot, frigid water 200 yards from shore. One of the first rules of search and rescue is never risk further lives for a rescue. Note that the Coast Guard boat that was deployed to assist, yet couldn’t get close enough to the man, also did not send any of their personnel in the water to rescue him, and the Coast Guard are trained in all kinds of water rescues. I think we all need to be cautious to not be armchair critics.
Jayson
10:48 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
I can understand the police argument about concern for their safety for trying to prevent a large person from killing himself. However, upon becoming unconscious, the victim was no longer a threat to the "rescuers" evidenced by the fact he was pulled in by a single young woman while they watched. That is what I find very upsetting.
Karen Zeltzer
2:37 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Alameda Mom, thank you for such a reasonable and rational response. And for highlighting how complex every situation is that that the police and fire department responds to. And how the every day civilian can make such horrible and insulting comments of judgment when they don't know the complexity of the decision that was made? Why can't we as a community stop pointing fingers and work together on solutions. Why the need for such tremendous judgment and blame and persecution. Its not what happened yesterday that I find so disheartening, its the venom of the response.
Frances Montell
11:16 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Thank you both to Alameda Mom and Karen for being voices of reason in the face of so much hysteria. "Armchair critics" is right. It is very easy to sit at your computer and type anonymous vitriolic attacks on people who are ready to risk their lives for you every day. Yes, I'm sure if it was a child or one of their colleagues or even you "a9501er" who was at risk of drowning they would risk their lives to make the rescue. But this wasn't such a "simple" case. I would really hate to be reading about 2 or more deaths when rescue personnel were unable to wrestle this 300 lb man out of the water and died trying to help him.
SunFlowers
1:34 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Frances,
I've been reading your comments through this thread here, and there really does seem to be a lack of compassion for Mr. Zack, his family and how the people are feeling here.
Yes, they are angered and confused by what has happened. Over 1/2 the people I've spoken too in my community are just flabergasted at what has transpired. Even some former AFD folk have commented, and not very pretty either. Rightly so.
A human being died. All you seem to be doing is picking what comments you want to rip apart as if these people here don't have a right to voice their outrage.
You keep saying the man is 300 lbs. In water, people are light as feather - for one. For another, even though our rescue and officers can not go in the water, they are able to throw a 75 foot line to a person. Now, Mr. Zack obviously didn't want to be saved, but I'm sure that a few people on the beach would have been more than happy to go out even 25 feet...or 40 feet, and throw a line AROUND the guy while everyone else on the beach pulls him back in.
I saw one of your posting to someone that he "wanted to die" as if this his choice only and we should just all stay out of it because it's not our mental illness - it's his.
You sound very cold hearted. Is this true?
Frances Montell
2:05 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
You are really misreading my comments then. People are hysterically criticizing the police and firefighters for not "simply" rescuing a large man who was standing 50 yards out in the water as if it is the easiest thing in the world to know what to do in that situation and not risk other lives, calling the people who do risk their lives for us all the time lazy, cowardly, overpaid, immoral, etc. etc. and you think *I'm* cold hearted? A large man who intentionally walked out into the water and does not want to be rescued would not be "light as a feather." He would probably not allow himself to lassoed like a steer either. I am sure I didn't say that he definitely wanted to die. I don't know the facts of the case and would not make that claim. What I said was that someone who did not want to be rescued would not cooperate with rescuers, and that it wouldn't be such a "simple" matter to get him safely to shore and these armchair critics claim. I also criticize the vitriol and insults that some people feel so free to hurl around here, and call for people to discuss this issue with a little more civility. You really read a lot of other stuff in to my comments that wasn't there.
SunFlowers
3:00 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Frances,
You are still standing strong that everyone here is an "armchair critic". I believe that you may be reading into people's comments too much as well and not seeing that at the core, we are somewhat mortified at what happened. There is a lot of disappointment, hurt, pain and shock over this person's life. YOU are still yet to even say "Mr. Zack" - as if he was just some 300 lb suicide thing. And indeed, he would've been much much lighter in the water...do you swim? It's the main reason why the woman was able to get him OUT of the water.
I haven't seen anyone say that a rescue would be "easy", I've seen people asking questions "why" it wasn't possible for someone in rescue to walk out there and get the guy. Maybe it would've been easy...maybe not. It's too late to find that out now isn't it?
This incident has really scared a lot of people. They have been watching for about 4 years now this city dumping itself into something that nobody ever thought it would be, including myself.
I know these people sound harsh - but I'm also able to read what they are saying...and I understand...and actually - alot of it needs to be said. We spend so much time fluffing things we say nowadays so we don't get anyone uptight. It's more "ethical"...well, sometimes, somethings just need to be said - AND ALAMEDA is speaking it.
Frances Montell
3:17 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
SunFlowers, why are you so focused on me? Why do you keep going on an on, completely mischaracterizing my comments? How are you "able to read... and understand" the people who are spewing vitriol and insults, but you can't seem to understand my simplest point? So many questions... But really, I don't need any more answers.
SunFlowers
4:06 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Well, I can see that you feel this is all about you now. Maybe back up your boat and think about Mr. Zack, can you do that Frances? Is that in any way possibl for you to do is think about someone else? I hope that changes for you.
Marie paoletti
2:43 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Pensions come from PERS and the city does not pay pensions, only the contributions to the retirement fund. usually the agreement for the City to pay contributions is in lieu of a wage increase.
John
2:52 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Alameda Fire Dept has 16 people whose earnings and benefits cost the citizens between $ 200,000 –$ 275,000 last year.Another 55 whose earnings and benefits were between $ 150,000 - $200,000.
The median expected salary for a typical Fire Fighter in the United States is $41,308.
I don't think pay or budget cuts the issue here.
Linda Treml
3:42 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Instead of blaming city policy, I would point out that the character of our police and firefighters is assumed to be such that action would be inherent, overriding bureaucratic consideration.
Karen Zeltzer
3:57 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Linda, The Alameda Police Dept. staff is made up of truly ethical and caring individuals who put their lives on the line every day and do it with courage and heroicism. To imply anything negative about their character is appaling to me. Must this continue to disintegrate into such netative and non-productive comments? This is about policy and procedures and the interface with other agencies and funding, on top of many issues that you and I are unaware of at this stage in the investigation. Plain and simple. I take great offense to your implying anything negative about the APD staff on site during this situation. Would you say that to their faces? If they were right in front of you? Its easy to type insulting things at your computer. Can you imagine how much APD staff who were there on site are having trouble coping with what they saw and the position they were put in? They are suffering enough without needing to read these kinds of comments.
Frances Montell
11:35 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Whoever you are "Pleidianwaves" your comments are really disgusting. I hope that you are only such an unpleasant and offensive know-it-all when you are writing anonymously, and that in real life you don't tell people to shut up and insult them every time you disagree with them. You might try imagining that the person you are writing to is a human being and your neighbor and maybe someone you will actually see again in this small town of ours and choose your words accordingly.
a94501er
4:09 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Karen Z, tsk tsk ... APD/AFD are not the saints you make them out to be. They make a pretty penny, their jobs are voluntary (nobody forced them to sign up) ... so the least we expect is to show some alacrity in situations such as these when a man is standing in water for nearly an hour and yet our "finest" let him die.
melissa sherak
4:34 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
94501 er/
I think you hit the nail on the head. We along with others are in the real world and Karen happens to be living in the Land of Oz. As someone has said, "What would they have done if it were one of there kids or co-workers?' We would now be reading a story about a rescue... not suicide. They should have done the right thing and rescued the man and then got him immediate help. Isn't this your line of profession? A counselor Karen?
ka
4:34 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
According to Lt. Sean Lynch,"...there are protocols that need to be followed."
How and when did protocols come before a human life? And when did they come before your own oath of protection? How is it that the correct action is more apparent to a 20 year old girl than to our trained agencies?
Be appalled Karen. Be appalled that men and women are so afraid of being sued or fired, that they will watch someone's loved one kill themselves and do nothing. When your son or daughter is in trouble Karen, and I am there, I will take action to help them, fully aware of the consequences that, if in the process I legally do something wrong you may sue me or cause me some other discomfort from my action.....however, your children will be still be alive. In this case, the truly appalling thing is that no one reasoned in love. Fear won the day.....
Karen Zeltzer
4:44 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
What I have said and stand by, is that it is unfair and harmful to people's lives to comment on the particular people who were at the beach, in the situation that they were in. It is impossible to understand the complexities of the agencies involved and the decisions that were made. To insult the particular men and women who responded and to question their character is the lowest response possible. I am saddened by what happened, I hope that the issues that led to this siuation will be firmly addressed and that appropriate protocol will be put in place asap to ensure that this never happens again. But, I do not blame the indiividuals who were present from APD for this situation. It is a much larger systems issue that needs to be addressed. That is where I stand. Oz? I think not. As a social worker, I feel squarely rooted in the realities of life. Oz would be more appealing, though, I think.
Frances Montell
11:43 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Good for you, Karen, for continuing to be so reasonable in the face of so much hysteria and personal attacks. I am a Berkeley hippie child who can be plenty critical of the police and authorities, and even I am appalled at the cowardly anonymous attacks against our police and fire fighters by people who obviously do not know what they are talking about.
Eve Pearlman
4:50 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Hey, everyone. Let's cut the personal attacks. They are not useful and they are extremely unpleasant to most readers. Also, I am working on a story about some of the details of how the events unfolded yesterday, which I hope will help answer some questions. --Eve
Frances Montell
11:46 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Pleidianwaves: who put you in charge of who should post and who should "go away"? Are you saying that everyone who has a different attitude or perspective than you should expect to "get slapped?" You may enjoy that kind of atmosphere, but most readers of Alameda Patch do not. You are the one who should "shut up" and "just go away" (to use your own words.)
Jack Boeger
5:26 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
New post on the incident at Aquatics Fan: http://webh.it/resc
Hope you don't mind me putting it here, Eve.
AlamedaNative
5:33 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
I emailed the mayor, the fire chief and several city council members last night. Today I got a response. See below. Everybody, and I mean everyb ody who uses and enjoys the bay waters off Alameda is at risk, and we didn't even know it. We didn't even know that if we got into trouble, no one would rescue us. Appalling. Absolutely appalling.
Thank you for your email regarding the tragic drowning at Crown Beach
yesterday. My thoughts and prayers go out to Mr. Zack and his family.
My heart also goes out to the members of the public who watched this
tragic event unfold, and to those who are rightfully upset by this.
We are in the process of conducting a thorough investigation of this
matter, and will do so in a public and transparent manner. More
importantly, the Interim Fire Chief is taking immediate steps to change
the department’s existing policy regarding shore-based rescue. In the
future, the Fire Department’s commander on scene will have the
discretion to send swimmers into the water as circumstances allow. The
Interim Chief is also putting resources into retraining and
re-certifying rescue swimmers so that they can be available in the
future.
Since Alameda is an island, we will likely face shore-based water rescue
situations in the future, whether intentional or accidental. We need to
consider how we want to allocate our resources to be prepared for such
situations in the future.
Again, thank you for your email.
Jack Boeger
5:41 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
What AlamedaNative said.
This is much bigger than this tragic suicide. It has just been revealed that their policy is: do not go in the water under any circumstances.
What else can't they do?
John
6:01 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Jack they were all water trained until 2009. I'm assuming all the fire Department working Sunday were all New Fireman and didn't have the training.
Jmasterson
7:22 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Here's an interesting letter to the editor of the Alameda Sun in 2009 about water rescue in Alameda. It is the fifth letter down.
http://www.alamedasun.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5546&Itemid=11
Eve Pearlman
9:42 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Pleidianwaves: Please skip the taunts and personal attacks. It's better for everyone. --Eve
Jon Spangler
10:42 pm on Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Many commenters here have revealed their ignorance of past city budget cuts by saying things like "buy a boat."
Some of the same people who are outraged by what happened Sunday are the ones who have publicly opposed raising taxes to pay for schools and other vital services. I would just like to remind them that they cannot have it both ways.
The 2009 budget cuts that eliminated the water rescue unit from the AFD were accompanied by an order from then-Chief David Kapler (!) that no one from AFD was permitted to go into the water any more, period. Similar cuts put the limited APD's enforcement-related craft into dry dock.
a94501er
7:50 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Jon, sorry ... but you are way off the mark. The swim rescue program costs a max of $40k. For this piddling amount we could have saved a life and avoided the million $+ liability in a potential lawsuit. Funny how the budget woes don't seem to stop APD/AFD from getting a hefty pension.
And in keeping with Eve's suggestion, time to practice a little humility (I know it can be difficult for you) by not making comments that accuse the commentators here of "ignorance".
joel
11:58 pm on Saturday, June 4, 2011
Jon , be serious for once , it does not take money to walk on a sand bar , asking for it is racket . You sdaid Chief Kappleer eliminated the water rescue , would you care to elaborate on ewho put that request on his desk . The very same person that video taped what every firefighter do .
John
12:10 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Jon.....Pardon my Ignorance...But Compensations of AFD that look like this don't really look like they affected the pockets AFD.
Alameda Fire Dept has 18 people whose earnings and benefits cost the citizens between $ 200,000 –$ 275,000 last year.Another 55 whose earnings and benefits were between $ 150,000 - $200,000.
John
12:19 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
If we made total Compensation for all Members of AFD 100,000K we could save enough to actually have New pools to train kids to swim and probably have fleet of boats . Considering National Average for Firefighters is 41K and 3/4 (750,000+) of Firefighters in USA are volunteers.
steven coaker
3:41 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Let's not be distracted by KZ who wants to shove this all under the water. The truth is AFD didn't even attempt a rescue, not even get their boots wet. Not a single individual in that fire or police department had the heart to even
TRY to save the man's life. Blah, blah 'we lacked certification', blah, blah, 'protocols to follow' - how do these people at AFD sleep at night knowing they did nothing, they didn't even try.
It's about as heartless a story I've ever heard. And KZ continues to blow her trumpet for AFD and APD. Let's have some of these mislabelled heroes come forth and give their names. That's all, just tell us who they are, so we and their neighbors in their communities will know who they are.
By the way, KZ, the "we" I refer to is in the overwhelming response of compassionate people.
Jon Spangler
11:37 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
It is far too easy for any of us to judge and criticize what we view as others' shortcomings after the fact. And many of the critical comments here seem to be cheap shots taken at others' expense. Is that what the posters intended?
I think a bit more compassion (as voiced by Alameda Mom and Karen Zeitzer) and a lot less judgment from those who have NOT walked a mile in the moccasins of the public safety personnel who were prohibited from rescuing someone they were sworn to protect. Let's find a positive solution to this glaring problem, folks.
It also appears that many of the more critical commenters here have no understanding of the phrase "chain of command," which is a key component in public safety agencies around the world.
Making personal attacks on anyone, including our public safety personnel, is extremely counterproductive. They were not the ones who cut the water rescue and certification programs from Alameda's budget, and they did not oder themselves to never go in the water again. Ask former Chief Kapler (remember him?) and those responsible for making the budget cuts instead. Just remember that they are all human beings, too.
John
11:41 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
The rationalization of all this is more pathetic and is as sad of what actually happened. We count on these people to step up and they didn't. Spin it anyway you want but it's a tradgedy not only in what happened but in the actions of people the Citizens count on to trust in an emergency.
John
11:48 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Jon Spangler your Alameda Mom and Soccer Dad masks are getting very old. I know you and the bride are paid spinners but sometimes best to put down keyboard.
Jon Spangler
1:15 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
John, I always post here using my first and last names. I never use only my first name. Alameda Mom and Soccer Dad, as well as anyone else posting here under another name, are other people. Furthermore, I resent your insinuation that I am paid to post anything here - I am not a shill for anyone, any more than you are.
John
11:59 am on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Stand up for what is right, even if you are the only one in Line!
That is what this 100 lb Female Nurse did that no one else seems to comprehend.
Beachgoer
12:35 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
We indulge generous and early-out retirement programs for police and firefighters, nominally in exchange for the physical challenges and risks that are inherently part of the job. When the assumptions underlying this exchange are shown by non-performance to be lies, it is time for an aggressive recalibration.
a94501er
1:02 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Well said. I don't understand why Jon Spangler doesn't get it ... and continues to sing hosannas!
John
12:55 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
The mindset needs to be changed. Cleaning house and hiring a whole new Fire Department that actually feels part of the community and a responsibilty to its citizens versus the I , I , I, Me Me Me ,Mo Mo Mo, Money Money Money mantra they have been singing burying the citizens of Alameda who have sacrificed anything of any value in the city to take care of them with Huge Pensions and benefits. Very Sad situation.
Jon Spangler
1:22 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
The change that is needed is (and was) a simple change in policy that has already been effected. No wholesale
firings or dismissals are required, just the policy change and the budget restorations needed to re-institute the previous water rescue training and certification program. What about these straightforward changes does not make sense to you, a94501er and John?
What happened was most certainly a tragedy and it was avoidable. All quite true.
I realize that public floggings crucifixions are popular, but they are a terrible way to run a civil government. (They are far more appropriate under a military occupation, but you would not want to live there, would you?)
a94501er
1:34 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Right ... move along folks, nothing to see here (as Jon has decreed).
Whoa man! What have you been smoking? Would you be so sanguine if your family member died as a result of such stupidity? I think not (and also wish it never happens).
joel
10:30 pm on Sunday, June 5, 2011
Jon
You are fairly new in the Island "all due respect" the Firefighters have run out of the Island every single Fire Chief that was not going along with their agenda , do the checking , I have .
by the way Chief Kappler filling up his BMW is very far from being an isolated incident there is no audit for gas usage at the fire dept nor the Public work , nor thetre isd monitoring for the fairly large vehicle pool
John
1:36 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
I want to live where people Stand UP for what is right and do what is right Jon. Rationalizing and making excuses is your world. Does Common sense and just being human need to be policy. Doesn't Firemans oath mean anything?
“Fireman's Oath:
"My duty is to protect those that I serve from whatever danger they may face; whether it be fire, demon, or angel; no matter the danger, I will protect the people to the best of my ability. I am but a servitor of the people; my duty is to those who I serve, and to no one else. I serve The People, without fear, without remorse, without fail. My Duty is to The People. By my Fireman's Oath, I am bound to protect those who are in danger, those in times of need, those who I would serve."”
John
1:49 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
So this is different Jon Spangler.
"I am not a shill for anyone, any more than you are."
JON M. SPANGLER
EXPERIENCED COMMUNICATOR, MARKETER, & ADVOCATE
Edited and proofread campaign mailers and web copy for winning Alameda City Council, Alameda County Board of Supervisors, and AC Transit Board candidates on rush deadlines. Wrote and revised forms and web copy for small businesses. Researched and wrote articles for Alameda Municipal Power newsletter. Edited monthly newsletter for East Bay Bicycle Coalition (2007).
Jon Spangler
2:56 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
John, I am not being paid by anyone to post my words here, and I do it on my own time. I DO have a right to make an honest living by editing and proofreading - for accuracy as well as grammar - don't I?
I work hard to accurately represent the truth both in my work and in my comments here. And I never willfully misrepresent the truth, whatever I am doing. And I never use a partial name or a nom de guerre here.
Tom Becker
2:06 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
I don't buy the lack of training funds argument. There's been plenty of cash to dramatically increase salaries and pensions. Maybe we could have used some of that to maintain programs?
Jon Spangler
3:00 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Tom,
The city budget is complex, with income and expenses coming from and being allocated to many different categories. Training and equipment budgets are not the same as budgets for personnel (salaries, pensions, benefits, etc.).
It is likely that the $40,000 or so in water rescue training and certification had very little to do with overall salaries, in other words.
Beachgoer
2:51 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
This is not a matter of "budget restorations." At these pay levels, we must demand that so-called public safety agencies work efficiently and effectively within the available budget. Shoveling more money into a broken system, only encourages the system to remain broken, but at an even greater cost.
John
3:12 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Jon Spangler lives on Rationalzation Circle Tom. It is around the corner From Accountabilty Lane. There is always a resonable explaination and Jon has it. Your just missing it.
Jon Spangler
3:16 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Beachgoer,
Actually, it IS a matter of not only changing a n AFD policy but also restoring the $40,000 or more that is required for AFD's water rescue training and certification program. Those funds were cut in 2009 and the money to restore the necessary training and certification has to come from somewhere. With looming budget deficits and cuts all over the map being required, where would YOU find the money? It has to be done, since nothing that a public safety agency does can be done without proper training and certification.
a94501er
6:52 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Hey Einstein, how about pay cuts and pension freezes?
SunFlowers
4:16 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Well, I believe the lesson here is that if we ever find ourselves in this situation again, where we don't actually "see" our system actively working for us, we can then let down that false security because the paramedics and police are there and do something about it ourselves.
It is very sad to know there were 75 onlookers, and they all stood around and watched this man die...probably due to the fact that so many fire trucks and police were around. They probably thought it was all under control. I have the feeling that this man may have lived if AFD & APD never showed up. I have the feeling that perhaps many people would have gone to Mr. Zack's aid. I can only hope.
Next time - HUMAN CHAIN PEOPLE....HUMAN CHAIN.
Karen Zeltzer
5:26 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Sunflower, with all due respect, would you have been willing to be the last link on your proposed chain to have bee physically closest to a large man hell bent on dying? We are not talking about someone drowing and wanting to be saved, we are talking about a man whose mental state was not okay at that time. If it were someone accidentally drowning, many, I'd say most Alamedans would have willingly stepped up to be that last link. This situation is different. And to all of you, how about your respond without personal insults?? This is a reasonable question. But, if I must get "slapped," now at least I know to duck :)
Karen Zeltzer
4:51 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
I've decided to take a break from all of this because I no longer saw it as healthy debate but personal attacks and low blows. After a refreshing break I am back for a quick minute to highlight a pattern that the people who are making personal attacks are not using full names, the people who are trying to have a healthy debate do. So, I propose that all use their full REAL names and lets see if it changes people's tones. Francis, thanks for your comments. Hey Tiffany, do you want to lead the way?? "Slapped", Really??!!
Pleiadianwaves
6:42 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Correction: I never said you needed to get slapped. I asked you to shut up (which was pretty rude to say the least)
The "slap" comment was a metaphor to a comment posted about the Oath that our AFD took. I still believe they should have to consider this in depth....in essence, get "slapped" with the Oath they took.
I'll humble up in my comments and in my passion here at AP. With that said, most of you are truly not seeing (or at least not showing any kind of compassion) for the individual that died. All I see are defensive comments and accuses - policy or not. All I see is how there was no way to save a "300 lb, suicidal individual" from carrying out an act where he was obviously in a lot of mental pain - because he was "set on dying".
I would expect something different from you, being a counselor and all Karen.
Frances Montell
7:08 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
"Pleidianwaves", you feel free to make personal remarks to Karen about her profession and you won't even use your real name. I notice that "Tiffany"'s comments are a lot more polite than yours, are you really the same person? Is this a Dr. Jekyl/Mr Hyde situation?
You should really take a closer look at your actual comments. Karen was very charitable to say you "owned up" to your behavior, when you did not actually do so. You are not guilty of "passion" but of rudeness, offensiveness, and aggressive personal insults bordering on threats. Would you tell someone to shut up and go away to their face? You are splitting hairs about what you did and didn't say, or else you are just forgetting all the rude remarks you made. While you didn't say Karen "needed" to get slapped, you did say that she should expect it. To quote: "Karen walked her way into a very difficult situation. She shouldn't have come into this forum with the attitude that she has... Of coarse she's going to get slapped." Yeah, that calm, rational, informed attitude is really asking for it, isn't it? Are you still saying that anyone who disagrees with you should expect to get slapped?
a94501er
1:37 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Karen Z, It doesn't take a genius to figure out a man is dying ... and form a human chain of 6 (or 10 or whatever) able bodied fire/police personnel and drag him out of the water. Sure beats standing twiddling your thumbs!
Carol Parker
5:02 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
I concur Karen. I think the tone of posts - not just on this thread - but Alameda Patch as a whole would change if everyone used their full names. For me, reading these posts as well as the posts to the companion article - what I sense is that most of us have the utmost respect for our firefighters and police officers in this town and feel shock that this situation occurred - in part because they have always served us so well. When I took a CERT (Citizens Emergency Reponse Training) class in town in the Spring I learned for the first time we no longer had a fire boat and that water rescues were covered by the Coast Guard. I was surprised by this and at the time thought I should write a letter to the City Council. Now, I wish I had. In the class it was presented as a budgetary decision made by the City.
Karen Zeltzer
7:05 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Pleidanwaves- you were doing a good job owning up to your less than stellar comments ie.shut up, and explaining your word choices- I was actually respecting that from you- until I got to the last line- did you need to make it personal again and question my professionalism?? To review all of my comments I referred to this as a tragedy and that I was deeply saddened and that I was also expecting a thorough review of the situation to lead to a changes in system protocol. Nothing cold or lacking compassion. My responses extended compassion to the men and women who were in the beach in a horrible predicabement, whether you agree with my feelings or not, all of my comments showed compassion. How about you make one response to me without attacking me or my professionalism. I have not once attacked you personally. I did encourage you to sign your full name, which you chose not to do again. Why? If you are truly okay with your words and the effects of your words, sign your name to it. Just a thought
Karen Zeltzer
7:16 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Oh and one more thing Tiffany, I feel quite passionate also. I don't use my passion as an excuse to behave badly. No matter how passionate I feel, I am still responsible for my behavior at all times. No excuses. Its called personal responsibility. You can't take back words and they become a true reflection of who you are in a moment in time. If we were sitting across a table sipping coffee together, eye to eye, you might show a very different side to you. I'll hold that as a distinct possibility and give you the benefit of the doubt. That is why I encourage people to not hide behind a code name so that they are not being true to who they would be in person.
Jon Spangler
7:33 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Karen, I agree with your suggestions regarding the use of our full names at al times. I also agree that some commenters have apparently felt rather free to make personal attacks on other posters as well as public safety personnel. It would certainly be preferable if we could be more civil and constructive.
After all, nothing we can say or do here will bring Raymond Zack back to life. All we can do is move forward and try to make sure that his death - and all the anguish that the unfolding drama at Crown Beach involved for everyone - is not in vain.
Karen Zeltzer
7:34 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
And one more, one more Tiffany....I responded to "Jenna" that there is a tremendous difference betweeen ending pain and ending life and encouraged no one to be "glad" that he is "out of his misery" because help is available to anyone suffering, anyone in pain- to feel better and to get the support they need to not see suicide as the only out. And I listed resources.... Not compassion in this situation Tiffany?? Lets be done with our back and forth now. I'll put up the white flag..how about it?
Pleiadianwaves
8:38 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Karen,
Perhaps it would be different if we were sitting across a table from each other. My frustration and anger isn't even directed (completely) at you. It's how you have responded to many of the people here that angers me in regards to you. Sure you have had a couple moments (few) in your statements, but most of them are whats driving the anger your way. I'm sure this wouldn't be at your door unless you attracted it to your door - I see this is at my doorstep as well, and I will reflect upon that.
Over all, my initial feelings come from what actually happened. Read the words of the mother below, and perhaps one day you and I will have tea together. Or perhaps I'll see you at the memorial.
"Oh, I loved that boy so much," said Dee Berry.
After Berry called 911 to help her suicidal son Raymond Zack, firefighters told her they could only watch as he succumbed to the frigid waters off of Crown Beach and died.
"It's damn frustrating. That's how... " said Berry.
I'll white flag this with you - and I understand that your rational words are meant to calm the masses. People are angry Karen. They are really really angry right now. Perhaps your rational comments were a bit premature. Read the words of this mother...and tell her about policy.
This is my direct, calm point now that I've climbed down out of my tree.
Carol Parker
7:37 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Here is some new info - a quote from his mother & info about timetable for new training for personnel
http://current.com/news/93258516_after-firefighters-watch-man-drown-alameda-agrees-to-reinstate-water-rescue-training.htm
Carol Parker
7:46 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Full interview with Raymond Zack's mother
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/nationalbreaking/ci_18186732
margaret dos santos
8:13 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
At Karen,
The human link could have spoken to Raymond....what we don't know is if he really wanted to die. I believe that if you want to die then you should have that right as a human being. I also know that if Raymond Zack was my family or my friend I would AT LEAST have wanted our first responders to do that, go out and talk to him, and yes I would have been proud (as someone that could never swim in the beach) to have been the last link...to know that death is what HE wanted....
Jon Spangler
8:26 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
@Margaret, Unfortunately the Alameda FD personnel on the scene were prohibited by a 2-year-old policy from even entering the water after the budget for AFD's water rescue training and certification had been cancelled in 2009 budget cuts. The firefighters would much rather have tried to save Raymond Zack's life but were under orders to stay out of the water.
I know several firefighters and paramedics in the AFD and I cannot imagine any of them wanting to stay out of the water, be uninvolved, or watch a man die. This, too, is a tragedy that should have been avoided but was not.
margaret dos santos
8:46 pm on Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Jon, I appreciate what you wrote and...actually I am more upset at myself for not knowing this was the policy.
With that said I have also read the Oath that Firefighters take, and I read there job description. They needed to do something....and with the job description, which is Alameda's ..... it clearly states "water rescue"....I have no doubt that the family has already heard from lawyers that would love to take the case.
it wasn't too long ago when we worried about our lack of school funding that was going to bring down property value in our lovely island city.....I think that the national news we are getting on this matter will make that happen...no matter how great our schools are.
Cabforles
8:41 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Alameda County has a Search and Rescue Team of over 70 member which are trained in water rescue, they have on going training all the time for this ( check out there website). Police and Fire know about this yet nothing happened !!
John
8:55 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011
All of are Firefighters who were hired before 2009 were trained in Water Rescue. Trained and acting are two different worlds.
alameda vigilante
11:19 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Well, the FFs who were hired before 2009 did not suddenly forget how to swim when the budget was cut. And the woman who finally did bring the man in was NOT a trained water rescuer, either! A word about nom-de-plumes:(if it was good enuf for Mark Twain, it's good enuf for me!) Writers who do not use their real names are not cowardly. They do it to direct attention to their ideas rather than to themselves. They're not out for personal aggrandizement.
Frances Montell
11:29 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Very self-serving post, "vigilante". If you think you are anything like Mark Twain you are suffering from delusions of grandeur. You can call yourself whatever you want but it is clear that those who are hiding behind pseudonyms are ruder and more offensive than those using their real names, and we can only assume that they are not "brave" enough to insult people using their real identities. And your ideas are not taken as seriously either. If you want to direct attention to your ideas, then use your real name and write your ideas in a clear and respectful manner. Otherwise you are just engaging in a cowardly flame war.
SunFlowers
12:49 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Frances, it looks like we don't have to hide behind pseudonyms to feel we are righteous for harsh judgement. As I said yesterday, you seem a bit hostile yourself.
Frances Montell
12:56 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Sunflowers, please stop directing your comments at me. You do not know me and have zero insight about me. Your amateur psychologizing is way off the mark. I am beginning to feel like you are stalking me and it is creeping me out.
Pleiadianwaves
9:26 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Creeping YOU out??? Amateur "psychologizing"???? - Don't you mean psychoanalysis? No...I think SunFlowers called it right. You haven't even posted your own post here. All you've done is stalk and creep around in here to vent your misplaced anger Frances...to use some of your own words that is.
alameda vigilante
11:29 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011
P.S.: All they needed was a surfboard, not a boat--short distance, shallow water! And when is someone going to publicly apologize to the family? Both Chiefs Noonan & Fisher (who each make more than $300,000/yr; according to Patch) stood @ the podium in the 5/31/11 CityCouncil mtg for ~1 hr, & all they did was make excuses & ask for more money from the City! Neither Chief Noonan nor Chief Fisher apologized to the family. The Mayor did not apologize. The CM did not apologize. Unless I missed it. Saying it "will never happen again" is not an apology to that man's mother.
Alameda Resident
11:32 am on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Eve, how about a policy of removing comments from people who don't post their full names?
a94501er
1:32 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Why is that a problem? Can't stand the truth?
Turnstile
2:27 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Um...people can still use fake names. Try again.
Jon Spangler
1:01 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
NPR's "All Things Considered" carried a story on the tragic incident last night:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/storyComments.php?storyId=136864398&pageNum=1
I hope all the armchair critics of the AFD personnel who were at Crown Beach will keep in mind that AFD trucks would not have any water rescue gear on them following the issuance of the water rescue/water entry prohibition in 2009, and that an unprotected rescuer (no wetsuit or drysuit) would only have about 15 minutes in the water before succumbing to hypothermia herself/himself. That makes trying to talk someone back to shore really problematic even for a willing firefighter who is unprotected and unequipped...
John
1:08 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
The rationalization of all this is more pathetic and is as sad of what actually happened. We count on these people to step up and they didn't. Spin it anyway you want but it's a tradgedy not only in what happened but in the actions of people the Citizens count on to trust in an emergency.
Stand up for what is right, even if you are the only one in Line!
That is what this 100 lb Female Nurse did that no one else seems to comprehend.
All of are Firefighters who were hired before 2009 were trained in Water Rescue. Trained and acting are two different worlds.
a94501er
1:27 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Nothing prevented 6 able-bodied firemen from going into the water to rescue him ... their very presence deterred other onlookers from being more proactive.
Jon, I would like to see you rationalize this if you (or anybody in your family) happened to be on the receiving end of such stupidity. Not that I'm hoping for it to happen, but a little perspective helps. At the end of the day, a human life was lost because of a $40k training budget, while Fire/Police personnel still have their cushy pensions.
Quite a tradeoff, eh? Disgusting.
a94501er
1:24 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Jon Spangler, please quit with the rationalizing ... that is extremely insensitive to the family. You ought to know better.
Pleiadianwaves
1:36 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
I completely agree with you "a94501er"...it's been the "rationalization" that has caused me to really lose my grace here with certain people.
Lamar
2:01 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Alameda (like most municipalities) is starved by over-payed, non-performing bureaucrats with huge pensions. Bring back the volunteer fire dept, I'm sure they could figure out how to wade out to the guy and throw him a life ring.
G. Cobre
2:10 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Jon Spangler,
It is sickening to read your defense of these cowardly public servants ( yes, that is exactly what they are! ) , that stood around doing absolutely nothing , while a man that obviously needed help , was drowning within feet of them. They where informed in advance by the mother of the victim,( yes victim), and they knew what he was trying to do. To say now that they where afraid of their own safety is cowardice and men like this should never be in the police or fire dept. There are many people who have saved lives of fellow citizens in very dangerous situations and they where not trained to do so. They are called HEROES !! Our overpaid public servants should hang their heads in shame , Alameda is being talked about in the whole country and not in a positive way.
Jon Spangler
2:18 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Pleiadein, John, and a94501er,
Your mantle of self-righteous criticism and blaming might be a bit easier to take if you had any empathy at all for the public safety personnel involved who wanted to help but could not. (I grieve for the survivors and mourn for the dead just as much as you do, and recognize just as clearly as you do that this tragedy should not have happened. Why can you not accept anyone's response to this tragedy other than your own as "correct"?)
Alameda PD personnel are not trained at all (never were) in water rescue, and deserve no blame for not jumping in the water. Alameda Fire personnel had their training, certification, and equipment pulled out from under them, so when this incident came up their hands were tied and they did not have the gear to effect a safe rescue.
How do you think they felt in that situation? Do you have any empathy for them or are they simply to be condemned in your opinion?
(Your previous comments tell me you would rather condemn than understand them, which is far from charitable or kind on your part. It is your selective empathy, your selective outrage, and the ease with which you blame others that separates us. And that saddens me, as there are many victims here and you are creating more with your armchair blaming.
a94501er
2:29 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Jon, what training did the swimmer who eventually pulled the man back have? She weighed 100lbs or so. Are you telling me that 10 fire/police personnel could not have formed a human chain and pulled the man out? Assuming avg weight is 200 lbs (fairly conservative), that is 2000 lbs vs a 300 lbs drowning man (if that is what he weighed, from what I hear)
Is your middle name Malarkey?
Why can't YOU accept the fact that APD/AFD screwed up? Why are you so intent on defending them? Are you their patron saint? Get a life dude.
Pleiadianwaves
2:30 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Sit down with Dee Berry Jon...I'm sure "those of us" you've pointed out here will sound like pocket change compared to what that woman will tell you.
Alameda Mom
2:58 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Thank you, Jon, for your support of APD and AFD personnel on scene. They are stressed out and grieving over what they experienced... and then on top of it all, they have to deal with this barrage of insults and lack of support for the situation they were in (whether put in the situation by budget cuts made by our City Government, or because the situation was too risky being a suicide with no proper gear to enter the water- [a rescue person is suppose to avoid becoming another person needing rescue] - MOST likely both of these reasons ). There are elements of this situation that we don't even know about because we were not there, and yet what we do know is being distorted and twisted. The lack of desire to understand the complexity of the situation, the ugly insults and the derisiveness of the discuss on this site is a big part of the tragedy for Alameda.... and it doesn't take away the horror of suicide nor Mr. Zack's family's grief.
Carol Parker
2:26 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
From a website called "Lifeguard 4 Life"....
http://www.lifeguard4life.com/2011/06/first-responders-watch-man-drown.html
Lifeguards deal with suicidal people often. People jump in front of trains, off piers, drink themselves to death or just walk into the water and hold themselves under water. Lifeguards are not to risk their own life while attempting to rescue a suicidal victim from train tracks, but we are trained in how to stay far enough away from a victim that we are not in danger. With a floatation device life a lifeguard buoy, lifeguards are able to stay above water while fighting to get the unwilling victim to shore.
a94501er
2:32 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
I don't have any sympathies for the presumably hurt feelings of APD/AFD. A man died on their watch and he is not coming back (try telling that to his 80+ year old mother).
APD/AFD have cushy pensions to look forward to (heck, they probably even received OT for all the standing around they did on the beach) ... while the poor mother has lost her son.
You must be a cold-hearted machine if you can't see the human element here. Get off your pontificating horse for a change.
Lamar
2:40 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Saying they were not trained is such a lame excuse. If they had any initiative or brains they would have run over to Big 5 and found countless items that would help rescue this guy. Instead they are lazy, overpaid bureaucrats who would rather watch someone die. Why are we paying for this?????????
Karen Zeltzer
3:33 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Shucks, I really did want to stay out of this whenever it deteriorates..oh well, here goes...Tiffany, no one, NO ONE provokes bad behavior from anyone else. If that were the case, I can certainly say people's personal insults, attacks and low blows would certainly have given me the provocation to lash out hatefully and hurtfully during these last few days on this site. No one is responsible for any one's personal attacks or criticical damnations on this site than the people who choose to respond this way. And once again, yes, you could make up a name, instead of use a real name, but if you were actually deciding to make up a name, wouldn't that tell you that you are uncomfortable with your choice of words and comments? Lets lay off J.S for a while with the insulting tone. Shouldn't we give this all a rest for a while and wait for the resoults of the investigation? I'm sure that people's blood pressure could benifit from a break. Seriously.
Pleiadianwaves
3:54 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
I'm not Lamar, Karen...and I believe I have already joined you in the "white flag". At this point, I would encourage you to seek out Dee Berry and have a serious conversation with this woman. My belief at this point is she could share a lot of light for you.
Please refrain from trying to tell me to change a name that I've chosen for my own reasons, that doesn't have anything to do with you. I had it before I met you and I intend to keep it. Thank you Karen.
Basel
3:29 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
2009: So with a red pen in hand, the then Fire Chief Kapler lines out water rescue training saving $40k in a jurisdiction completely surrounded by water. After lining out the item, he goes to the station house and tanks up is BMW. The City Manager consents to the budget cut and sneaks out working for another city.
2011: The interim Fire Chief quickly reinstates the training the day after the incident. Now everyone is waiting for the multi-million dollar lawsuit.
Using the training excuse is the easiest way out. Three or four or even more could have donned PFD, tied to each other and waded out there. No one wanted to get wet on Memorial Day weekend. For that, the city will need to settle a major $$$$$$$$ lawsuit.
Think out of the box. Google "Lenny Scutnik video"
a94501er
3:54 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Basel, that sums it up well.
Kapler walked away with his pension intact as will Alameda's hometown zeroes with their cushy pensions and OT for "working" on a long weekend.
Dee Berry will never get her son back.
Jon, DO NOT try to rationalize this any further.
G. Cobre
3:56 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Karen Zeltzer,
Who do you think will do the investigating of this sordid affair? The Mayor , Bonta , Tam ? Are they not the ones that benefited from the mailers during the last election that came from the fire dept.?
As for Jon Spangler, there is a name for people like him, lets just say he wants to be in with the powers to be at the present time and does his darndest to ingratiate himself , he has no human compassion and you don't seem to have any either.
Karen Zeltzer
4:11 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Well, I can't say I didn't try! Personal insults make people's potentially valid points disappear, its a shame. Many of you may have swayed other's opinions, including mine , had many of you decided to present your point of view in a productive, informative way instead of clouding it in personal attacks. I have tried to consider different points of view and I have learned somethings from these ongoing dialogues, but I guess I am done reading all of this as the personal insults and negative attacks no longer makes this productive. I hope that the investigation is fair, I hope that positive changes will come from this and that public safety is improved. I also have Raymond's famiy in my prayers as well all others involved in this situation. Bye y'all.
a94501er
4:29 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Karen Z, too bad you can't be bothered to listen to dissenting opinions.
All of us hope positive changes come from this disaster. Alameda needs to be taught a lesson that public safety is paramount and would be fitting if Berkeley Labs decides to go elsewhere.
APD/AFD will have to live with this for the rest of their lives. Maybe they will agree to forego some of their cushy pension and contribute to a scholarship in memory of the victim as penitence. One can only hope.
The city (and all of us) will be on the hook for a multimillion dollar lawsuit. That should be another teachable moment.
DeAngelo
4:16 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Privatize the fire service now or better yet, go to an all volunteer force. How can we even begin to justify overpaying (and offering gold-plated out-of-market pensions to) these firefighters when they've made it perfectly clear they will cower behind self-serving work rules at the public's expense? I'm tired of overpaying these consummate bureaucrats. This has to stop now. Stop dealing with the union; they don't deserve a say in their compensation. People deserve to be paid for what they deliver, not what they can wrangle from the public trough by threatening/buying politicians. For what our fire service has delivered , they should be writing checks back to the public.
Lamar
4:17 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Yeah Karen let's just all be quiet, let them investigate themselves and maybe it will all go away. Not going to happen, people are feed up with this BS and the only way it will change is if we stand up to the incompetence and wasteful spending. Sadly it may take this event to be the catalyst of the return to responsible city leadership.
G. Cobre
5:44 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Karen Zeltzer,
You said you tried to smooth things over, over what? What you tried and it obviously didn't work , is to convince the Alameda people to your point of view. Just look how many people are responding and some of us very passionately, considering the severity of this tragedy. There are thousands more following this on many blogs and websites all over the country. The vast majority is condemning what happened here in our City. There was no attack on your character , just questioning your feelings toward the victim in this tragedy. We Alamedans have to live with this blemish on our town from now on.
Carol Parker
6:00 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
Young Turks TV show video commentary on incident
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjqJaEpucDY
Ona
11:57 pm on Thursday, June 2, 2011
As an Alameda resident and parent of two young children, I am absolutely horrified as what happened. If a child was out there, are you telling me they wouldn't have attempted a rescue because of a policy that prevents them from entering the water? I'm sorry, but we LIVE ON AN ISLAND PEOPLE!!! If we can't rely on them to assist in a shallow water rescue, what's going to happen when a real emergency occurs?
I'm taking this as a wakeup call to all of us who believed that our well paid Police and Fire departments could manage a shallow water rescue at Crown Beach!!! Also, it's frightening that people are making the convenient assumption that he intended to commit suicide when obviously we don't know that 100%. If people can assume suicide, I guess I can assume that maybe this man with mental illness was crying out for help and noone came. A sad day in Alameda.
John
12:11 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Ona....This was a Real Emergency to Mr Zack and his Family. My thoughts and Prayers are with them.
Ona
12:54 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Hi John,
The REAL EMERGENCY I was refering to was the fact that if the FD claims they can't go into shallow water to rescue someone, what are they going to do if a large scale natural emergency occurs like an earthquake or a tsunami when water rescues would be needed? Just stand by and let people drown? It just doesn't make any sense to me since we are surrounded by water and if you've ever been to Crown Beach, you know how shallow it is which makes the story even more tragic that he may have died from hypothermia from staying in that water for an hour while around 75 onlooker watched him die :( My heart goes out to Mr. Zack's family.
Craig Long
2:48 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
OK. I got tired of reading all the personal junk on this thread. I have one question that may have already been asked. If so, I apologize. Somewhere I read that "under no circumstances" was AFD allowed to enter the water to effect a rescue because they were not certified in water rescue. If this is true, would they call the Coast Guard to rescue a child who waded into the water and was drowning? I'd like to think they would risk the legal liability and just do it. I think the real reason they didn't act was because the victim did not want help, period. That this could be a matter of facilitating a suicide is a whole different sorry. As far as I know, Oregon is the only state that permits assisted suicide.
Pleiadianwaves
6:43 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Craig, this may not even be a suicide as first noted. Perhaps read some of the interviews with Dee Berry. This may turn out that he was mentally ill and not understanding what was happening to him. We all understand that AFD/APD were not allowed to go in the water...that fact has been so overstated I can't even acknowledge it anymore.
Has APD/AFD apologized for this yet? If so, I'd like to know about it.
susie smilth
7:08 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
I was walking at the beach listening to my ipod when I came upon the crowd of emergency personnel staring into the water. I didn't think anything serious was happening because no one went into the water. All I could see was (what I thought of at the time) was a large orange buoy floating offshore. I continued on my walk towards the bayfarm bridge. When I returned a half hour later everyone was in the same position. A kiteboarder went out near the buoy,circled around it but didn't communicate with the emergency personnel. I didn't ask what was going on because there were children playing, families having a picnic etc. I didn't think this all would be happening if a person was out there dying. I'm just as guilty as any other bystander for not trying to help and maybe I didn't ask because I didn't want to know. In any case, what if the person out there wasn't a 280lb man, but a child or a suicidal teenage girl? Would everyone have stood there and watch a child or teenage girl die? What would you have done? All I know is I was there and I didn't do anything.
Pleiadianwaves
8:28 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Is Mr. Zack's life less than that of a child?
John
7:35 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Hi Susie,
You might have been listening to the same music the AFD was listening to.
I drove by twice heading to Friends and was sure the Fire and Police were doing the right thing and had it under control. I have never doubted their Service to Alameda and considered alot of the old ones Family. They have been great to us. I don’t agree with the Compensation Packages that have escalated out of control and have now put this City in Financial Peril and now seeing this makes me frkn Sick.
carol gottstein
10:29 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
I wish to point out a well-known medical fact I'm surprised the police did not know. Antidepressants themselves, (especially the newer ones) have SUICIDALITY as a side effect so marked it appears as a boxed warning (cf Cymbalta ads/ product insert). So the victim could have been appropriately medicated & still suicidal; a danger to self, which the police are supposed to be trained to deal with. News reports say this man's condition was known to public safety personnel from an encounter on the same beach last year; apparently he wasn't violent or threatening to them then; which makes their behavior in this circumstance even more inexplicable.
It seems to me that writers who use a full 1st/last name are almost always apologists for the status quo. (apologist=one who makes apology for or defends; status quo being the people in power, incumbents). Why?
c. gottstein, M.D.
a94501er
10:51 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Carol, good point re: the medication and also the apologists. Glad to see you defy the trend :)
btw, I am still waiting for Jon Malarkey Spangler to spin the latest update (re: the county flatly denying AFD asked for help) and thus rendering our local "zeros" to look every more foolish.
John
10:47 am on Friday, June 3, 2011
Dr Gottstien.
They want to let them(Politicians know) I will defend you, please don't take away my funds for my programs or cut my salaries . I will kiss your frkn Axx no mater how wrong you are or how bad you look or how stupid you sound or act.
G. Cobre
12:19 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
Does anybody know the name of the courageous lady that went into the water to get the poor man? What happened after she pulled the man out, did the police talk to her ? She is the hero in this whole sordid affair.
She certainly deserves a medal.
margaret dos santos
3:13 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
Amen to that.....
susie smilth
4:42 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
I nominated her for the Alameda local hero award yesterday. I called all the city agencies and they could not release her name due to confidentiality reasons, so I nominated her anonymously. I was told that she could not get the award w/o her name and address. I called the APD and AFD and asked since they know her name if they could nominate her and was told "that would not be appropriate." Too bad, because she's the only one that passed the "what would you do? " test.
By the way Carol, I notice that you use your first and last name also.
Charla McMillian, J.D.,CSCS
1:25 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
The apathy, cowardice, and inaction in the death of Mr. Zack are maddening for bureaucratic incompetence and individual idiocy! Standard police motto "To protect and serve?" Yeah.
APD and AFD patrol an island!! Lack of training for water emergencies is absurd. For would-be criminals: need to excape APD? Just go to the water, they don't know how to go after you.
This response couldn't have been more opposite to what's expected from those who've earned the uniform.
We assume our folks in blue have basic physical fitness & preparation for problems anticicipated on an ISLAND. This case had neck deep water for a 6'3 man. Coast Guard was improperly briefed about location water depth so they brought the wrong boat. Nearby Oakland emergency responders were never asked to send proper equipment & aid. Think water rescue of the unwilling too dangerous? The 20 year old female who ultimately delivered the 300 lb body to police-men, did it alone - 4 or 5 strapping lads, allegedly fit for duty, armed with PR-24 batons & required restraints, would have had no more difficulty.
APD: plenty of training to hide and trap anyone turning left on Park at 4:01 pm, troll for drivers going 3-4 mph over the 25 mph crawl limit, & gather for coffee and snacks in cafes. But a man intentionaly drowning in front of them? First responders did anything but act first or respond.
APD just stencil a new motto in your squad room: "To reject action and observe," because you can't be bothered.
margaret dos santos
3:11 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
I understand (please correct me if I was given false or outdated information) the Oakland Fire Department has a boat docked right over on Pardee Street, I would think that a call to that Department within the first 5 minutes of the Alameda Fire Department 's realization that they would do nothing...would have saved Raymond Zack's life. No FIRST RESPONDER should allow a citizen to die on there watch!
margaret dos santos
3:39 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
Nominate an Alameda Hero ...this is on the Patch....they are looking for nominations for "hero's" .....I have posted there that the young woman that pulled Raymond Zack out of the water as the APD and AFD did nothing....should be our city's hero for this year......
susie smilth
4:43 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
See above, Margaret. I tried to nominate her but couldn't find out her name.
Pleiadianwaves
3:43 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
So it's been 4 days since this tragedy happened...we are, all over the country, mourning Raymond Zack, feeling for his family and waiting.....still waiting to hear from our "authorties" on the initial findings of their so called "transparent as possible investigation". There is nothing! I believe that most of us here have uncovered more details and shared them with the masses than the frickin "Mayor" or anyone else upstairs.
I know...it's difficult to climb over the mountains of money they sleep on every night. Those pensions, and making sure they don't ever go away, is a lot of hard work.
So what's the initial investigation? I'm sure yall could have figured that out within the first 6 hours of conference time. Come on ladies and gentlemen...share with the community of Alameda, who pay your checks, what you've found. Transparency means to see through...funny...I don't see anything at all???
Vincent
4:41 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
Lots of discussion here too :-
http://statter911.com/2011/05/31/alameda-ca-firefighters-suffer-image-blow-as-they-watch-man-drown-dave-believes-without-training-equipment-they-shouldnt-have-been-dispatched-to-the-call/
http://firelawblog.com/2011/05/duty-to-act-needless-drowning-in-alameda/
Lori Jeffcoat
8:09 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
Wow.... interesting comment on how certain agencies should have/could have referred out, instead of watching an emotionally disturbed man die... and no, he was not, nor had ever been violent, to my knowledge. I still cannot wrap my head around this whole mess.... esp. since reading the local paper this morning and finding out that Mr. Zack was still alive but hypothermic when "lone female hero" pulled him out of the water. In my line of business , if I do not refer out to someone who has better knowledge, or superior skills, I possibly lose my license due to malpractice. I am amazed at the level of incompetence and excuses being passed off as "protocol". I agree with whoever said that these individuals who contributed to the false security of action being taken should be taken off their jobs. We, as civilians, quite possibly could have done what needed to be done, an hour before he stopped standing in the water. Just my thoughts...
Jayson
10:18 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
The police state they did not attempt to intervene because the victim was potentially unstable and violent. After the victim became unconscious, I doubt he was any threat. Certainly, the young lady who pulled him in as they watched did not view him as a threat.
AlamedaAngel
12:12 am on Saturday, June 4, 2011
Joel - I'm not the person who wrote the letter to the editor in the Alameda Sun. I was quoting from it, hence the quotation marks. The Alameda Fire Dept isn't "hiding behind paperwork". They are PROHIBITED from attempting a water rescue. Their boss told them that they are not allowed in the water. Now all the other people standing at the beach could have. They were not at work.
And no, you are wrong, not assisting someone in danger is not punishable by jail time in any country that I know of.
Maybe you should read this article from another EMS blogger:
http://thehappymedic.com/2011/06/rescuers-stand-by-while-man-drowns/
John
12:58 am on Saturday, June 4, 2011
It’s a frkn sand bar going out hundreds of yards. Fisherman have to go out a long ways just to get hip deep. 60 degree water isn’t like rescueing an Ice Fisherman. Anyone who has any clue about Alameda knows this. It's been like this for 50 years.
John
1:08 am on Saturday, June 4, 2011
The 10 Year contracts implemented in OCT 2001 and the months following in the absolute worst financial times our country has seen since the Depression and we offered Lifetime Pensions of 90% of highest pay and medical benefit and salary packages that have crippled the citizens of Alameda and the city. Most companies at this time were cutting salary's and Benefit packages 50% and laying off just to survive and implemented self directed retirement plans with very small contributions by the company.
The Taxpayers have given up alot of "Skin" and the City has deferred most maintance using duct tape and mirrors to keep sustaining these Salary packages to our employees.
Look at what it has gotten us.
John
1:13 am on Saturday, June 4, 2011
In October 2001 when this was approved the Tech Bubble had already popped and Stocks and The Nasdaq Market had Lost 80% of Its Value and All Tech companies Were laying off thousands. To not be aware of what had transpired in previous 12 months to this regarding economy and what was happening and go ahead and approve raises and new benefits to employees was HUGE Betrayal of the Citizens of Alameda.
Look what we have been rewarded with after 10 year contracts.
John
1:23 am on Saturday, June 4, 2011
After watching the city Council meeting the Day after this tradgedy the approach at the Budget looked as cowardly as our Cities Finest performed on Monday.
It is sad amd pathetic where we have gone as a city. I use to be a very proud Alamedan.
John
9:32 am on Saturday, June 4, 2011
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57061124/64385-2009-03-16-Fire-Info-Bulletin-1762
The memo that the fire department used to justify its actions on Memorial Day also contains information - for those that read all the way through to the bottom of it - that contradicts what the department has claimed.
Specifically, it says that funding has been re-instated, and that re-certification was to begin again in 30 to 45 days - two years before Raymond Zack waded into the water at Crown Beach.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/06/03/INN11JOD18.DTL#ixzz1OKFdqHNG
alameda vigilante
3:47 pm on Saturday, June 4, 2011
AlamedaAngel, I hope youre not a public safety official! Youre dead wrong. If anyone's boss prevented them from doing the moral thing in a life/death situation, the boss should be ignored. Only following ordersb is for Nazis @ Nuremberg, or robots.
joel
5:18 pm on Saturday, June 4, 2011
Alameda Angel :
Should I see someone bleeding and laying in the street , should I turn my lawn mower on so I can't hear the cries and maybe wear some dark glasses until the death come ?
That is basically what all the braves did that day ,, when all they had to do was to walk on the sand bar .
Oh but the boss said you cannot get your feet wet and it is against the union contract to disobey to save a life .
DeAngelo
11:57 pm on Saturday, June 4, 2011
We've paid our public "servants" ridiculous salaries for too long, and for what? An ever entitled attitude and continuously worse performance.
The voters need to make it clear in every local election: We will not fund another cent of government revenue until we stop wasting money on these bloated, overpaid union bureaucrats. The private sector will do the job for about half the total cost (the market probably dictates a slightly lower salary, but with a 401K instead of the bloated gold-plated, spikeable pensions that kick in at age 50). And they will do it better because any private sector employee to declines to do his or her job (standing on the beach and watching a man drown for the better part of an hour) will have no union to hide behind and will be shown the door.
Better yet, volunteer fire service. I will sign up.
AlamedaAngel
8:19 pm on Monday, June 6, 2011
You cannot have a volunteer fire dept in an urban city of 75,000. Rural communities? Sure. It would not work here. The private sector CANNOT provide 911 service - it's terrible at it. Look at AMR's fail in Oakland. The medics who work for private ambulance companies are demoralized, underpayed and are constantly replaced by green medics. Why? Because all the good medics leave go work in the public sector. Why? Because public sector employees MAKE A LIVING WAGE. You cannot pay people $15-20 an hour and expect to retain them. Not when they are working a job that might kill them and will definitely give them PTSD. When was the last time you went to work knowing that you might die, or you might see someone else die? The fire, police and paramedics DESERVE TO BE PAID WELL.
DeAngelo, if I called 911 and you showed up, I would run.
DeAngelo
11:04 pm on Monday, June 6, 2011
The public sector tolerates far too much laziness, sloth, and incompetence at the taxpayer's expense. People deserve to be paid what they're worth, no more, no less. Standing on the beach watching a man drown isn't worth a lot to me.
And if you call 911 you better hope someone shows up who isn't going to stand around gawking at you for an hour, send the taxpayers an inflated bill, and then blame it on phantom budget cuts.
joel
12:06 am on Sunday, June 5, 2011
There are 10 of thousands brave Americans that have seved this Country some paid the ultimum price , they gave their life for this Country , other will be cripple for life and some Courageous fighter came back Home with no jobs some no House , it is time to reward bravery and hand over these City Jobs to Citizen that deserve it , not some cockey pararading in a red truck blasting their sirens to get their latte at starbucks , or their lunch at Towne Center.
Notlivinginalamedaanymore
7:22 am on Sunday, June 5, 2011
If the APD and AFD are not certified in water rescue on a island, maybe they shouldn't get paid soooo much!
alameda vigilante
4:18 pm on Sunday, June 5, 2011
Mike Noonan, @ $340,142 in 2010; Alameda's most highly paid city employee.
APD & AFD: "Dedicated to Excellence/Committed to Service" ??? Timely quote heard on CSPAN this weekend by A. Quinones-Hinojosa,M.D., giving a commencement address @ Southern Virginia College: "The world is a dangerous place not because of those who do evil, but because of those who LOOK & do absolutely NOTHING"--Albert Einstein
Carol Parker
6:31 pm on Sunday, June 5, 2011
Oakland Tribune (S.J. Merc News) article today looking back on the incident
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_18211068?nclick_check=1
Pleiadianwaves
5:23 pm on Monday, June 6, 2011
Beverly Johnson claims that an outside investigation is in order and what findings "can be" made public, should be made public. Key phrase, "CAN BE". How politiky is that? Get ready for the candy coat.
joel
8:53 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
to montel , kate , jon spangler , you keep contradicting yourselves , You stated that after 15 minutes a person would succomb of hypothermia in the frigid water of the bay , knowing the type of medication depress person take {you can look them all on the net they all have the same secondary effect} they did not try after 15 minutes , 30 minutes 45 minutes nor 1 hour , they had the hypothermia factor at their advantage , It is now proven that he was not armed or dangerous , anyone could have yank him out of the waist deep water as the small Wooman did , bring him to shore and lock him up until he got his medication straight , itb is also proven by the Police records the scene was clear , they never call the san leandro rescue , not the county , 2 boats fully equiped and crew ready for shallow water rescue the big cheese public statement .
That tragedy could have been avoided in many way ,
simple effective communication .
and more important having having Firefighter and Police Officer leaving in the community , in short be part of it . We now have aliens working in the City , take their GPS away they wont know east from west .
Pleiadianwaves
6:26 pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011
It's been one month today since Raymond lost his life here in Alameda. God bless you Raymond. God bless you and your family and community that weeps and misses you. We will never forget....
r. zack
10:04 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011
THE ZACK FAMILY 12-07-11
I have just skimed over these comments for the first time ,
Thank You for your heartfelt love and expressions of sympathy.
We all thought he was safe in Alameda.
Your concern and dialogues has restored my faith in humanity.
Thank You not letting this tragedy pass un-noticed.
Sincerely, Mr.Zack