.
Feedback

Why America is Fat

The confluence of two moral imperatives and a mild defense of Mayor Bloomberg

NYC Mayor Mike Bloomberg has been catching a lot of grief the last few days for his proposal to prohibit movie theaters, fast-food restaurants, refreshment stands, etc., from selling sugared beverages (i.e., soda) in containers larger than 16 oz.

Legitimate criticisms notwithstanding (and there are some), I think he has a point; the underlying issue isn't the beverages themselves, but a marketing approach that encourages over-consumption. This fits in nicely with a theory I've been working on for a few years about why the U.S. seems to be in this weird obesity epidemic.

One reason (not the only one, to be sure) is the unfortunate confluence of two behavioral imperatives that almost all of us have been programmed with since infancy.

The first is "Wasting food is a sin." My Dad used to tell me that in the Army mess hall, the sign said, "Take all you eat, but eat all you take." How many of us have grown up with some version of "Finish your plate, children are starving in Europe/China/Africa/Mexico/India/Pakistan" — every generation, every immigrant group, had a different region. Folk music parodist Allan Sherman recounted that when he was young, he really thought that if he finished his plate, it would keep those children from starving in Europe — and that's why he was fat. I still have trouble throwing food away.

The other is, "It's stupid to pass up a bargain." This is the "supersize trap." Who wouldn't want to get twice as much soda/fries/popcorn/onion rings for only an additional 29¢? Twice as much!! C'mon, what's wrong with you?

And you can't blame the poor kid behind the counter, the only reason she's saying, "You can have 32 oz. for only 25¢ more" is because the manager told her to, and the only reason the manager told her to is because that's how he was trained, in a management program that selects against independent thinkers and focuses only on short-term profitability. Hell, you can't even blame the owners, they're just being capitalists, and it's like the parable of the frog and the scorpion; it's just their nature. They want to sell you as much as possible, and the more they sell you in each transaction, the more profit they make.

A little while ago, I was in a Subway out towards Lodi. As you may be aware, they have this price promotion for "five dollar foot-longs", i.e., 12" sandwiches for $5. But, trying desperately at the time to get my weight under control, I didn't want a whole 12" sandwich, I only wanted the smaller, 6" version.

The 6" sandwich was $4.49. That is to say, half as much sandwich cost 90% of the full-size sandwich. Now, I understand pricing, and I wasn't expecting half a sandwich to cost $2.50, but y'know, maybe $3.29? $3.49? $3.69?

I paid the $4.49 (plus tax, of course) for the 6" size, and felt like a moron. I felt like I had cheated myself. I felt like someone had just sold me the Brooklyn Bridge. Or an actual subway.

Now, some might say that I could have eaten half the 12" sandwich and taken the other half home. And I could have. That doesn't work for me in that particular situation, but when I get a take-out sandwich at or a or like that, I'll often eat half and put the other half in the refrigerator for later.

But that's not the point. I didn't want a 12" sandwich. And I felt like I was paying for one anyway.

So on the one hand, the thrift imperative pushes us to buy more food than we really want, and then the don't-waste-food imperative kicks in and we're compelled to finish it. This also contributes to "portion-size inflation," another factor in America's overeating.

I see Mayor Bloomberg's proposal as an attempt to break that cycle. And I applaud him for it.

Turnstile June 2, 2012 at 12:41 pm
How about some self control. We all know the risk of indulging too much. No one's to blame but yourself if you decide to buy and drink 32oz. of soda and get fat. How many people decide NOT to buy a large soda. At least we have a choice, right?
America! Freedom of choice! I can choose to Supersize my fries if I want to. But wait, that would make me fat. Better stop Micky D from giving me that choice. There that should do it. Now I WON'T get fat. Oh but wait, I can buy 2 orders of regular size fries. Now I need 2 16oz. sodas to wash that down. Man that Bloomberg guy is so smart!
Howard Harawitz June 2, 2012 at 01:35 pm
I don't think it's as simple as exercising "self control." Not when we are constantly bombarded with very effective advertising propaganda on TV, billboards, and just about everywhere else. Information about good eating habits isn't nearly as easy to come by.
AlamedaGirl June 2, 2012 at 03:02 pm
I do think its about self control. I grew up with the "finish all that you take" "clean your plate" "dont throw away food". I also am bombarded by all the tempting super-size ads, and how it will be a waste of my money if I do not order the 12" sandwich or whatever.
Bottom line is, I control what food I put in my mouth. No matter what. I throw away food ALL the time -- and my thinking is "its better in the trash than on my hips or clogging my arteries." My body is NOT a garbage-disposal. But it takes strength and practice to tell myself these things, because it goes against everything I was taught growing up, and everything I see around me. It IS about self-control, 100%. YOU control what foods go into your body - no one else controls that. Next time you want to eat a 12" sandwich or a huge plate of restaurant pasta or 'clean your plate' --- think to yourself, 'my body is not a garbage disposal'. Works for me.
Jeff Mark June 2, 2012 at 03:43 pm
Discussions of self-control miss the point. I think it's a failure of the so-called free market to respond to the desires of those of us who not only don't want to buy 32 oz. of soda (the smallest size in many theaters) and drink it all, but also don't want to buy 32 oz. of soda and throw half away.
That's waste. Waste of food, waste of cardboard, waste of water, waste of the energy of the people involved in the production, service and disposal. Waste, by the way, that's reflected in higher prices for the rest of us. I think it's fair to say, as a general rule, that waste is to be avoided.
Cindy Berk June 2, 2012 at 04:44 pm
I agree Jeff. Waste is absolutely to be avoided. And self control has a lot to do with it but in the face of constant bombardment of the media to buy cheap and big - you often don't even get a choice. I do not feel deprived because I cannot simply get an 8oz cup of non -high fructose corn syrup drink. I just look elsewhere, but it isn't easy, so I make smart food choices. It is for most an education. This ban on the large and ridiculous starts a much needed conversation.
Serena Chen June 2, 2012 at 08:15 pm
I remember having conversation with a recovering alcoholic who was trying very hard to not give in to his addiction. He said he was doing fine until a sign told him to drink. It was a beer ad. Communities have a role in providing healthy choices for people and finding ways to limit the marketing of unhealthy products to children. We have only just begun to determine the true "cost" to society of sugary products.
Alameda Resident June 2, 2012 at 10:26 pm
The point is that although people COULD buy 2 orders of regular sized fries, they won't - and that's a good thing.
Turnstile June 4, 2012 at 11:43 am
Ok, they pass the law. Nothing larger than 16oz. sodas will be sold. But wait, I want more than 16oz. because I'm really thirsty or maybe I don't want to go back to counter during the movie so I buy 2. That's 2 cups, 2 straws, 2 lids. Isn't that more wasteful than half the a soda being thrown away?
I think you're missing the point here. You can choose to go to another theatre that sells 16oz. drinks or don't drink sodas for 2hrs because you don't want to be wasteful. Wouldn't it make more sense to offer various sizes and give people a choice as it is now? What if they decide a triple burger is too fattening and pass a law that you can only sell a single burger? SUV's wastes too much gas so we can only make small cars? Chocolate bars are too big? Well, I think you get the point. If we don't buy them, they won't sell it, but at least we have a choice and this is where self control comes in. Don't blame free market.
Tom Schweich June 4, 2012 at 02:42 pm
When one of the local greasy-spoons size-escalated their California Burger to a minimum 1/2 pound, we countered by ordering one and requesting that it be split. That's lost revenue for the restaurant, but I sorta feel obligated to tip as though we had bought two hamburgers.
John Piziali June 4, 2012 at 03:01 pm
AlamedaGirl, yes its called "common sense". I like your approach, rather than blaming it on advertising.
Tom Brody June 4, 2012 at 06:20 pm
The sandwiches from SUBWAY are yummy, especially the teriyaki chicken. That's why I always order the foot long option. Plus, it is interesting watching the cook assemble the sandwich, which involves arranging almost a dozen condiments right before your eyes, e.g., onion, jalepeno, olives, bell pepper, cheese, blah, blah, blah. However, I do have enough self-control always to avoid hamburgers.
Anthony Bologna, Jr. June 4, 2012 at 09:13 pm
My favorite $5 footlong is the Veggie Delight.....load it up with all the fresh veggies you want and like with the lite dressing, half now, half later.....what's wrong with that? Stay away from the meatball sub with a ton of cheese and you'll do just fine! Also, know why "we're fat".....what was the biggest attended event in Alameda this weekend....."Run, Jane Run".....??? or Off the Grid......!!! I rest my case......unfortunately.....!!!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Alameda Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Harve Coats June 14, 2013 at 09:17 pm
Woke me from a dead sleep. Sounded like 6 or 9 gun shots north of Melrose on Maitland DR.
David Howard June 15, 2013 at 02:08 pm
APD said they found no evidence of gun shots and suspect fireworks.Read More http://www.action-alameda-news.com/2013/06/09/fourth-of-july-public-service-announcement/
JSanders June 17, 2013 at 11:55 am
When they build that high density development on the Harbor Bay Club site with 25% low incomeRead More housing requirement, Bay Farm will be hearing a lot more gun shots at night.
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:42 am
So sad to see. Did you report this to East Bay Regional Park District? I provided the number in yourRead More last posting.
Lorraine Sarullo June 12, 2013 at 12:35 pm
Yes, I reported it to the EBRP staff who happened to be nearby at the beach. I also reported it toRead More the warden of Fish and Wildlife in Sacramento and the warden of the local territory. The local warden told me yesterday that he will be patrolling the area, but I did not get to speak to him today (only left both wardens a voicemail message).
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 04:11 pm
Nice, thanks for the update, and sharing these posts with us, Lorraine. If it is a person behind allRead More of this, hopefully he/she will get caught soon.
Carol Parker June 12, 2013 at 12:00 pm
Anonymous tip to the fire department?
quietneeded June 12, 2013 at 04:17 pm
Leaving a note to them is a bad idea if it really is a illegal operation. So many ways that can goRead More wrong. Just call the police dept. Leave a tip. Simple and safe.
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 09:03 am
Agree with Carol. Perhaps an anonymous tip to Alameda Fire or Alameda Police.
Alex Gronke (Editor) June 11, 2013 at 07:35 am
My condolences to Mort's family. This was a man who had a rich, full life. Thank you for sharing.
Nay June 11, 2013 at 09:24 am
Given the targeted harvesting of parts, this is not a "times are hard and food is scarce"Read More issue. It's greedy, ignorant, and yes it's disgusting and disrespectful to nature. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/2012/01/17/manta-rays-endangered-by-sudden-demand-from-chinese-medicine/
Lorraine Sarullo June 11, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Thank you both (Nay and Analisa) for the information. Maybe I got the name of the park serviceRead More mixed up. It was the beach area around Grand St.
Lorraine Sarullo June 11, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I contacted Crown Beach (part of the EBRP). They checked into the matter with Fish and WildlifeRead More (previously Fish and Game), to see if there was any wrongdoing. On the surface of things, it seems the wings (fins) are the edible part of the ray. And apparently, the way regulations are written it may not be even be considered littering! So, however inhumane, disrespectful, selfish, gruesome it may seem, there may not have been any fishing laws broken. Although, when I spoke with the warden of Fish and Wildlife he said he will be looking into the matter. To voice your opinion and propose changes to regulation, you can write a letter to and attend a Fish and Game Commission town hall meeting here is the link: http://www.fgc.ca.gov/contact/ and http://www.fgc.ca.gov/meetings/2013/index.aspx I plan on writing to suggest regulation against polluting public beaches with unused portions of the catch from fishing and also ask for recommendations on limiting the catch on fish that only have small percentage of edible parts (such as the rays). I would welcome any help in a letter writing campaign, the contact information is listed on the link provided above. Many Thanks.