.
Feedback

Alameda Ferry Bumps Some SF-Bound Riders

Even with extra boats in use, the San Francisco Bay Ferry from the Main Street terminal found itself with more passengers than space at times this weekend.

Some San Francisco-bound passengers at Alameda's Main Street ferry terminal were apparently delayed Saturday because the ferry was already nearly full with riders who boarded at Jack London Square.

"The first ferry at 9 a.m. was full by the time it loaded in Oakland. Rejecting all Alameda passengers except those going to Angel Island," said a reader named Lucy who commented on Alameda Patch's article on weekend ferry service.

A San Francisco Bay Ferry spokeman said he didn't have specifics, but Saturday's first ferry — the "9 o'clock boat" scheduled to leave Alameda at 9:10 a.m. — was the only one that would provide riders with a direct connection to Angel Island ferry service leaving from San Francisco's Pied 41.

If the ferry crew felt that some Angel Island-bound passengers might be too far back in line to make it onto the 9:10 a.m. ferry, they would give those riders priority, said Ernest Sanchez.

He said passengers who missed the 9:10 ferry would then have to wait for the next departure from Alameda, scheduled for 9:40 a.m.

San Francisco Bay Ferry has 16 or 17 departures a day scheduled for this weekend, with ferries leaving every 30 to 40 minutes, he said. 

"We're running four boats from Oakland/Alameda — normally it's one on weekends — and four from Vallejo," he said. "it's pretty much our whole fleet, except for one or two boats in drydock for repairs.

"It's probably going to be a record-breaking weekend," Sanchex said.

See the San Francisco Bay Ferry website for more information on ferry service this weekend.

Don't miss a day of Alameda news, opinion and events. Sign up here for the Alameda Patch morning e-newsletter. And 'like' us on Facebook!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Alameda Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Gloria Guerra May 20, 2013 at 12:54 pm
Please call Marlene Davis 510-521-8312 for more info.
Gloria Guerra May 20, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Arthur M. Jawad will stated he wanted the money to mainly go for the children grant fund, instead itRead More went in other peoples pockets.
Gloria Guerra May 20, 2013 at 12:50 pm
The day Arthur M. Jawad passed away someone payed the taxes where he lived. His son moved in andRead More home stead at the time. Later the couch at Saint Joseph Notre Dame high school did a quick claim dead and transfer the property where Arthur M. Jawad once lived.
Jeff Mark May 20, 2013 at 12:16 pm
OK, so here's a hopefully-reasonable suggestion. Lion's Mane, next time you see our creepy peeper,Read More call the police. Describe what you see, then let them, the professionals, who get their legal advice elsewhere than reality TV, tell you whether they think they need to check it out. Isn't that what they're for? Mane, please let us know if there are any newsworthy developments.
Lion's Mane May 20, 2013 at 11:26 am
Craig, who said anything about exhibitionists? I said one couple was "amorous," but thatRead More doesn't mean they were "near-sex making out" or anything else inappropriate or even bordering on it. I couldn't see *exactly* what they were doing, and I don't care. From my vantage point, it appeared that they were lying on a blanket, cuddling, talking, sleeping whatever. There were other in the vicinity--it was a warm Saturday afternoon--and no one else seemed to be paying attention to their behavior. The other couples he was spying on were all just sitting or lying together on their blankets. I get that it's probably not "illegal," which is why I haven't called the police, and I would never consider calling 911 for this matter--so that's why you should "believe" I "haven't already," Reeko. I don't think "daring to go out in public" means that you should be subjected to this behavior. Turnstile, I just may do that. I was toying with the idea, but my phone camera isn't very good. Who's to say he doesn't have a camera, too? Let's be clear here...this is not a guy just "out on the beach" with binoculars. I was also wondering when someone would be silly enough to ask why I was "watching him." I'm in my home, and I can see him very plainly from all of my windows and balconies--I'm not creeping on him. If I inadvertently see a guy crouching in the bushes watching people with binoculars, it's going to capture my attention. THOMAS PEREZ, I'm not even going to justify your comment with a response--though I've got a great one queued up--other than to LOL and move on. Please answer me this...why doesn't this guy just go out on the beach and openly sit near them or stand next to them and blatantly watch them? Good grief...I guess when one posts a question in a public forum, one must expect the requisite ignorant responses.
Reeko17 May 20, 2013 at 10:43 am
Police! Can't believe you haven't already.
Ben Newman May 20, 2013 at 09:45 am
So let me get this straight Anna, you'll go to Emeryville 16, and take your business to the massiveRead More chains located around it like Barnes and Nobles, Fudruckers, etc and then you bemoan the small businesses on Park Street that close? Sounds like you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater because what someone wrote in the local newspaper hurt your sensibilities.
Gevin Says May 19, 2013 at 11:57 pm
Jeff - It's GEVIN NOT GAVIN
Jenna May 19, 2013 at 08:59 pm
I lived on the West End twenty years ago, and lived there when the base closed. It's much betterRead More than it was, with more inviting places (to me anyway) than before. I drove down Broadway in Oakland today and the City has added some really nice hanging flower baskets. They are going to look spectacular later this summer. Maybe the City could do something like that on Webster. As if they have extra money for stuff like that, but one can hope. The baskets are up high so they are beyond the reach of ordinary vandals.
http://youtu.be/RhRFhyneFcw
Vicster May 18, 2013 at 08:36 am
I'm so glad he hadn't wandered away! I bike home from the ferry along Santa Clara and I kept an eyeRead More out for him. Sounds like he had himself a nice time, the cheeky monkey!
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 05:51 pm
Yay! I'm glad! Thanks for the update Suzanne.
Suzanne Chenier May 17, 2013 at 05:48 pm
Found!!! He followed me into my downstairs neighbor's house. I went to borrow some eggs. My neighborRead More was at work. I didn't know he followed me in, didn't see or hear him, got the eggs and left. I called that brat for over three hours. He raided my neighbor's garbage can and a bachelor nap on his sofa! Yay. I'm glad he's home and safe. Thank you everyone.
Cynthia May 20, 2013 at 10:03 am
Really? "Poopsie"? Besides that gripe, it makes me sad that we have no beach front thatRead More the dogs can go onto.
Jenna May 19, 2013 at 08:48 pm
I absolutely wish we had some beach frontage in Alameda for the dogs to enjoy the water, but no wayRead More would I take them onto the beach when it's not allowed. The signage is perfectly clear and the fine is probably several hundred dollars.Instead we head up to Point Isabel or Albany Bulb. I've counted 25 dogs in the water on a really nice day at Point Isabel. We're going to Disneyland!
Lion's Mane May 18, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Good point, Gevin! Forgot about the dog park!! Recently a woman with a big, off-leash Rott stoodRead More by and watched him take a huge dump at the water's edge, then she continued on her way without cleaning it up. The park police got here in time and paid her a visit, and she was none to happy about that...made my day. Unfortunately, a family with 2 little kiddos set up their blanket right in front of the Rottie's toilet spot shortly after she walked away, and I'm sure the kids were all over it. The no-dogs allowed ruling was probably inspired, at least in part, by irresponsible pet owners like her.
Gloria Guerra May 20, 2013 at 11:43 am
Alameda Police Havier Quintero beat me up on December 16, 1990 and he gut away with this.
bette page May 20, 2013 at 11:10 am
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Time-Eat-Dog-Sustainable-Living/dp/0500287902
bette page May 20, 2013 at 11:09 am
Time to Eat the Dog?: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living
Kimberlee MacVicar May 17, 2013 at 02:36 pm
Thanks for the info about your experience. I'm starting to hear the same story from about 7 peopleRead More now and I'm sure there are more. Store has been closed all week. Still no sign on the door. At a loss as to what to do to find out what's going on or what to do next.
bette page May 17, 2013 at 07:01 am
Good luck with that. I stopped patronizing them a year ago after some shifty practices with my highRead More end items: wouldn't give me a receipt and then my items sat untagged for three weeks. Completely missed the xmas shopping season.
bette page May 20, 2013 at 11:11 am
They are not open yet. Based on the signage I am assuming that it will be an Asian bakery.
photo originally posted by Dennis Domingo
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 07:15 pm
Carol, posted this on Facebook and got some responses so far:Read More https://www.facebook.com/AlamedaPatch/posts/666500700043838?comment_id=32723444&offset=0&total_comments=2
An accident occurred Monday, May 13 on Westline/8th Street turning into Crown Beach. Credit: Jessica McMahon
Carol Parker May 15, 2013 at 11:02 am
It is really dangerous coming out of the dog park/tennis court parking lot. We never try to turnRead More left coming out of it, always right - and even then you have to be super careful because cars just come speeding down the street.