Pharmaceutical Companies File Lawsuit Against County's Drug Take-Back Ordinance

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology groups filed a lawsuit challenging Alameda County's drug take-back ordinance that requires drug makers to pay for programs to dispose of expired and unused drugs.

By Bay City News

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology groups filed a lawsuit on Friday which challenges an Alameda County ordinance requiring drug makers to pay for programs to dispose of expired and unused drugs.

Passed by a unanimous vote of the Alameda County Board of Supervisors on July 24, the ordinance is the first such law in the country.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that the ordinance violates the commerce clause in the U.S. Constitution for three reasons, including that it regulates and burdens interstate commerce and its main purpose and effect is to shift the costs of a local regulatory program directly onto interstate commerce and out-of-county customers.

It says the ordinance also discriminates against interstate commerce by targeting such commerce and products delivered from outside the
county for burdens and by favoring local interests "by deliberately shifting
costs away from local consumers and taxpayers and onto drug manufacturers and pharmaceutical customers nationwide."

The suit alleges, "If this novel ordinance were permissible, then Alameda County could likewise require interstate news publications to conduct the county's paper recycling program or require interstate food producers to collect and dispose of all spoiled food or similar garbage."

The suit asks that the ordinance be declared unconstitutional and that its implementation be stopped. It also asks for unspecified costs and attorneys' fees.

The suit was filed by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the Generic Pharmaceutical Association and the Biotechnology Industry Organization. All three industry groups are based in Washington, D.C.

When the ordinance was passed, Board of Supervisors President Nate Miley said it is needed because the improper and careless disposal of prescription drugs and the illegal resale of prescription drugs puts members of the public, particularly children and the elderly, at risk of being poisoned.

In passing the measure, the board said another reason for the ordinance is that groundwater and drinking water "are being contaminated by unwanted, leftover or expired prescription drugs passing through our wastewater and treatment centers."

The ordinance requires drug manufacturers and producers to pay for the disposal of their products or face fines of up to $1,000 per day.

Alameda County residents currently can drop off their old medications at 28 drop-off locations but the program costs the county about $330,000 a year.

If the lawsuit is unsuccessful, companies affected by the ordinance have until next July, one year after it passed, to submit their plans to comply.

David December 10, 2012 at 02:32 PM
No, I have parents who made sure I cleaned up my own mess, and that I didn't expect some overstuffed bureaucrat to be my mommy and daddy. Grow up.
Richard Eisenman December 13, 2012 at 03:40 PM
Why are the Alameda Co Supervisors meddling in this matter ? Maybe part of it is that they feel such low self-esteem that they are desperate to seize some issue, any issue, to pass a law about so that they can feel some justification for their existence ?
Michael Moore December 16, 2012 at 12:56 AM
Liz, there is no rule that says humans are supposed to do anything other than what they do, which is equally good and bad. The bottom line is not that humans will survive, but that life will go on. David, the consumer has never been entrusted with the responsibility of disposal. Government has always stepped in to prohibit the dumping of things, after the consumers did a good job of poisoning either themselves or the later users of the area. Think Love Canal, most of New Jersey and Nevada as well as large portions on New Mexico and Eastern Washington. Remember that the Super Fund is paid by our taxes and not those of creators of toxic landscapes. In reality I expect the producer of the problem to clean it up. If folks dump drugs in to the water supply then I expect them to clean up the water supply. That is done through taxes which we vote on. I am not voting for more taxes. But then I do not toss pharmaceuticals in to the landfill, down the drain or in to the bay.
Fred Eiger December 24, 2012 at 04:21 AM
Unfortunately Richard, you hit the nail on the head with your assessment.
Fred Eiger December 24, 2012 at 04:24 AM
Spangler, there has NEVER been and NEVER will be a law that makes a manufacturer responsible for the entire product life. There would be no corporation able to take type of expense. All companies would be out of business. But then, that's what Leftists like you Spangler want; that there be no private businesses. Right Spangler?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »