.
Feedback

Supervisor Wilma Chan's Blog: An Update on Adult Day Health Care Services

An update on Adult Day Health Care, a program that helps seniors and disabled adults to live independently in their communities.

As you may recall, just a few weeks ago, hundreds of seniors and advocates for Adult Day Health Care in Alameda County gathered on the plaza at the County offices. Together, we called upon the Governor and the State of California to stop the elimination of ADHC that would have taken effect Dec. 1.  We called for more time, or a new and innovative solution, to help the nearly 1,000 Alameda County residents who rely on these services to live independently.

It was an emotional day as one resident described how ADHC services allow her to go to work and ensure her mom is under great care while another senior described how ADHC was essential to her receiving the care and companionship she needs. Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner described the short-sightedness of the cuts when placed against the long-term cost implications of other options for senior health care.

Last week we learned about a settlement between advocates and the State of California to delay implementation of these cuts and provide an alternative for those impacted. We are still waiting to hear about final details of the settlement, but here’s what we know so far: 

First, ADHC in its current format will continue through Feb. 29, 2012. That means the state will have additional time to ensure a smooth transition, which is especially critical in a county like ours where many of our ADHC participants face language, mobility and economic barriers to receive the care they are entitled to.

Second, in 2012, ADHC will be replaced by a program called CBAS offering center-based services to a range of elderly and disabled adults. I will monitor the development of CBAS closely and advocate strongly for this program to provide seniors and people with disabilities with the services they need.

Eliminating ADHC on Dec. 1 would have been devastating, both for the 7,000 people who work in this field and the tens of the thousands of people who depend on these services. Statewide, 17,184 nursing home placements would have been needed as a result. There are nowhere near that many beds available. Instead, many seniors and disabled adults would have been forced to seek long-term care in hospitals.  

Many thanks to all of the providers, clients, caregivers and doctors who have demonstrated their support of Adult Day Health Care. Their hard work and perseverance made all the difference in this fight. 

I will share more details as they emerge, and, over the coming months, I will continue to advocate for our area’s seniors and people with disabilities.   

 

+ + +

For greater detail, I’ve attached an excerpt from the Disability Rights Coalition news release.

Adult Day Health Care Settlement:  New Program for People at Risk of Institutionalization, December 1 Elimination Date Postponed

Oakland, CA:  Today, seven plaintiffs who represent a class of 35,000 low-income people with disabilities, including older adults, and the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) reached a settlement in a federal lawsuit that challenged the State’s planned elimination of Adult Day Health Care (ADHC) as a Medi-Cal benefit on December 1, 2011 (Darling et al. v Douglas C:09-03798 SBA ). The settlement ensures that even in these challenging economic times, critical community based services will be preserved and low income seniors and people with disabilities will avoid unnecessary hospitalization or institutionalization.

After extensive negotiations, the Parties reached a compromise which preserves ADHC-like services for people who are at risk of institutionalization, in a new program called Community-Based Adult Services (CBAS).  Similar to ADHC, CBAS will offer center-based skilled health and nursing care, therapies, transportation and other services, to eligible low income seniors and people with disabilities.  Under the settlement, the planned December 1, 2011 ADHC elimination date will be moved to February 29, 2012 to ensure a seamless transition for eligible ADHC participants to the CBAS program, and provide time for the Court to review the settlement and give final approval of the Agreement.

“There are a lot of people who really need this program; I have fought to stay out of a nursing home and have been able to with ADHC,” said Esther Darling, lead plaintiff in the case, age 74, who lives alone with the help of ADHC, and will transition to the CBAS program.  Under the terms of the settlement, CBAS will be offered through Medi-Cal managed care plans in most parts of the State. CBAS will be part of the State’s 1115 Medicaid waiver, and will not cap enrollment, ensuring that all eligible beneficiaries are able to receive these vital services.  Current ADHC recipients who are not eligible for CBAS will receive enhanced case management to assist them to transition smoothly to other long-term care services in the community.  Many of the current ADHC providers will be able to provide CBAS services, thus ensuring continuity of care. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Alameda Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Harve Coats June 14, 2013 at 09:17 pm
Woke me from a dead sleep. Sounded like 6 or 9 gun shots north of Melrose on Maitland DR.
David Howard June 15, 2013 at 02:08 pm
APD said they found no evidence of gun shots and suspect fireworks.Read More http://www.action-alameda-news.com/2013/06/09/fourth-of-july-public-service-announcement/
JSanders June 17, 2013 at 11:55 am
When they build that high density development on the Harbor Bay Club site with 25% low incomeRead More housing requirement, Bay Farm will be hearing a lot more gun shots at night.
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:42 am
So sad to see. Did you report this to East Bay Regional Park District? I provided the number in yourRead More last posting.
Lorraine Sarullo June 12, 2013 at 12:35 pm
Yes, I reported it to the EBRP staff who happened to be nearby at the beach. I also reported it toRead More the warden of Fish and Wildlife in Sacramento and the warden of the local territory. The local warden told me yesterday that he will be patrolling the area, but I did not get to speak to him today (only left both wardens a voicemail message).
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 04:11 pm
Nice, thanks for the update, and sharing these posts with us, Lorraine. If it is a person behind allRead More of this, hopefully he/she will get caught soon.
Carol Parker June 12, 2013 at 12:00 pm
Anonymous tip to the fire department?
quietneeded June 12, 2013 at 04:17 pm
Leaving a note to them is a bad idea if it really is a illegal operation. So many ways that can goRead More wrong. Just call the police dept. Leave a tip. Simple and safe.
Analisa Harangozo (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 09:03 am
Agree with Carol. Perhaps an anonymous tip to Alameda Fire or Alameda Police.
Alex Gronke (Editor) June 11, 2013 at 07:35 am
My condolences to Mort's family. This was a man who had a rich, full life. Thank you for sharing.
Nay June 11, 2013 at 09:24 am
Given the targeted harvesting of parts, this is not a "times are hard and food is scarce"Read More issue. It's greedy, ignorant, and yes it's disgusting and disrespectful to nature. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/2012/01/17/manta-rays-endangered-by-sudden-demand-from-chinese-medicine/
Lorraine Sarullo June 11, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Thank you both (Nay and Analisa) for the information. Maybe I got the name of the park serviceRead More mixed up. It was the beach area around Grand St.
Lorraine Sarullo June 11, 2013 at 11:18 pm
I contacted Crown Beach (part of the EBRP). They checked into the matter with Fish and WildlifeRead More (previously Fish and Game), to see if there was any wrongdoing. On the surface of things, it seems the wings (fins) are the edible part of the ray. And apparently, the way regulations are written it may not be even be considered littering! So, however inhumane, disrespectful, selfish, gruesome it may seem, there may not have been any fishing laws broken. Although, when I spoke with the warden of Fish and Wildlife he said he will be looking into the matter. To voice your opinion and propose changes to regulation, you can write a letter to and attend a Fish and Game Commission town hall meeting here is the link: http://www.fgc.ca.gov/contact/ and http://www.fgc.ca.gov/meetings/2013/index.aspx I plan on writing to suggest regulation against polluting public beaches with unused portions of the catch from fishing and also ask for recommendations on limiting the catch on fish that only have small percentage of edible parts (such as the rays). I would welcome any help in a letter writing campaign, the contact information is listed on the link provided above. Many Thanks.